Re: Deprecate the NR bit?

[Stephen Kent <kent@xxxxxxx>]

Bill,

>Now, this makes sense!  What do others feel?
>
>Bob Jueneman wrote:
>
>[snip]
>>
>> My sense is that tempers are fraying, everyone's patience is wearing
>> decidedly thin, and that the group is getting quite frustrated by the
>> fact that we haven't been able to identify any single, reasonably
>> simple definition for what we mean by NR.
>>
>> If that is the case, I believe we should deprecate the NR bit within
>> PKIX, and then charter another WG to explore the interaction between
>> the certificate contents, application (as opposed to protocol) behavior,
>> and the business and legal issues involved with signed documents.
>>
>> Bob

No.

Steve