Re: lifetime versus NR, Re: Comments on the PKIX Roadmap

[Sean Turner <turners@xxxxxxxx>]

Ed Gerck wrote:
...snip

> .
> There are other problems with the new roadmap (see my previous msgs) and problems
> which I did not address either --- and which IMO seriously undermine its usefulness
> to reflect what this WG discussed and what the protocols are for.  Two of its key
> purposes -- and that is why I suggested it should be recalled and redone.  It may be
> that the new PKIX roadmap  "captured the WG's feelings from around mid '98
> timeframe" as Sean Turner has mentioned today in this list -- but, aren't we
> around end '99 timeframe?

We'll update the NR discussion in the draft roadmap, but could you enumerate your other
concerns?  I think most of the ones I've seen so far dealt specifically with the NR bit
discussion.

Cheers,

spt