Re: LAAP performance issues

["Andy Dowling" <andy.dowling@xxxxxx>]

>
> Hi Andy,
>
> > 1. Batch LAAP requests.
>
> Rather not, unless there's strong concensus. Remember that the
> "L" in LAAP is for Limited. I expect that, in time, we'll have
> a CMP/CMC equivalent which can handle this.

This could also prove useful in cases where AC chaining is used (if the idea
sticks).
(i.e. the LRQ makes a single LAAP request for an entire AC chain for
verification)
Although this does assume that a single LRP can provide an entire AC chain,
this
may be the case in some environments (corporate VPN).

Could be worth thinking about...

Regards,

Andy