[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round

To: Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Polk <wpolk@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round
From: Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 1999 11:56:46 -0800
Cc: Denis Pinkas <Denis.Pinkas@xxxxxxxx>, ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
References: <><><>

At 12:48 PM 12/1/99 -0500, Russ Housley wrote:

I have a problem with either paragraph being added to this section. Consequences of detected and undetected compromise belong in the Security Considerations section, not here.

I agree fully with Russ. There are dozens of places in this document where we could also talk about the problem of the signing party's key being compromised, and this one isn't all that important relative to the others.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium

Follow-Ups:
- Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round
  - From: Tim Polk

References:
- Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round
  - From: Tim Polk
- Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round
  - From: Denis Pinkas
- proposed key usaged text -- the final round
  - From: Russ Housley
- Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round
  - From: Russ Housley

Prev by Date: Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round
Next by Date: RE: unqualified topic - not solved yet.
Previous by thread: Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round
Next by thread: Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread