Re: Repeated: QC biometric selection/protocol

[Denis Pinkas <Denis.Pinkas@xxxxxxxx>]

Anders,

> Stefan,
> 
> I look forward to consensus but without any comments on this
> 
> http://www.imc.org/ietf-pkix/mail-archive/msg03203.html
> 
> which is directed to the QC-designers rather than the list, it is very hard
> to have an opinion about the current concept for handling biometrics.
> 
> I think it was Denis Pinkas who originally suggested the hash-bio and Stephen Farrel
> who added the URI part.  Maybe they care to elaborate on this?

Your historic is correct. However, I said yesterday: "We should not
re-open that discussion". Thus, I do not want to elaborate more on
this at this time.

Regards,

Denis

> Note that several others in this list seem to agree with me that the hash+URI is
> equally privacy-depriving as the bio-in-cert solution.  So is the big question really
> only a matter of "file-size"?
> 
> Anders