Archive of ietf-pkix/old-archive-99, by thread
Go to date index
Go to main page for ietf-pkix/old-archive-99
Page 1 of 7
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
- Getting an OID,
Bruschi Danilo
- Announcement of the Internet Spatial Location Forum,
haitao.tang
- Help PKIX schedule,
Jorge G.
- confirm,
Ricky Charlet
- AC509 Login Name,
Nick Pope
- Sample source code for writing the HTTP/LDAP,
Franklin Lee
- [no subject],
susan.shimota
- Internet Security Conference, Call for Papers, Abstracts,
Dave Piscitello
- CRLs' cycle,
Pavel Krylov
- Why should not the BC extension appear in end entity certificate?,
Sungjin Lee
- ISOC Netw. & Distr. Sys. Security Symp. (NDSS 2000),
David M. Balenson
- Re: Shifting around the risk burden, Re:,
Ed Gerck
- RE: Online PIN & Server Wallet,
Anders Rundgren
- DS, NR and their legal effects,
Ed Gerck
- PKI Forum,
Juan Rodriguez-Torrent
- QC Bio-info leak?,
Anders Rundgren
- RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question,
MHenry
- RE: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question,
John C. Kennedy
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question,
Lynn.Wheeler
- Re: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question,
TMetzinger
- Re: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question,
Aram Perez
- RE: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question,
BalluffiF
- Re: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question,
Bob Jueneman
- RE: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question,
Phillip M Hallam-Baker
- Re: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question,
Lynn.Wheeler
- Re: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question,
TMetzinger
- Re: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question,
TMetzinger
- Re: RFC 2527 Physical Security Controls Question,
Lynn.Wheeler
- CA Audit Post,
Sweigert, David
- cert == crl,
Pavel Krylov
- Re: No, was Re: QC biometrics needs re-engineering NOW!,
Anders Rundgren
- certificate which has both AIA and CRL DPs,
Hiroyuki Sakakibara
- Q: Are repeated OIDs allowed in the AIA extension?,
Terry Hayes
- Re: Consensus Text for key usage?,
Aram Perez
- QC biometrics needs re-engineering NOW!,
Anders Rundgren
- Back to nothing: URI solution works?,
Anders Rundgren
- RE: Accessing/selecting biometrics was: Stray Poll: Finger-printsin QCs,
Anders Rundgren
- Repeated: QC biometric selection/protocol,
Anders Rundgren
- The definition of OTHER-NAME,
Tom Biskupic
- Accessing/selecting biometrics was: Stray Poll: Finger-prints in QCs,
Anders Rundgren
- Stray Poll: Finger-prints in QCs,
Anders Rundgren
- QC's - for human eyes only?,
Ilan Shacham
- Re: QC's - for human eyes only?,
Eric Murray
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: QC's - for human eyes only?,
Anders Rundgren
- Re: QC's - for human eyes only?,
Anders Rundgren
- RE: QC's - for human eyes only?,
Ilan Shacham
- RE: QC's - for human eyes only?,
Anders Rundgren
- Re: QC's - for human eyes only?,
Anders Rundgren
- Re: QC's - for human eyes only?,
Anders Rundgren
- Re: QC's - for human eyes only?,
ghilborn
- RE: QC's - for human eyes only?,
Ilan Shacham
- RE: QC's - for human eyes only?,
Anders Rundgren
- Internal conflict in QC profile?,
Ilan Shacham
- CRL Distribution Mechanism Evaluation and Considerations,
Franklin Lee
- TSP 4: socket protocol negPollRep message type,
Lewis McCarthy
- Certificates with DSA keys,
Johannes Farmer
- [no subject],
todd.glassey
- TISC Call for Papers,
Dave Piscitello
- RE: unqualified topic - not solved yet.,
Charles Moore
- RE: unqualified topic - not solved yet.,
Tony Bartoletti
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: unqualified topic - not solved yet.,
Charles Moore
- Re: unqualified topic - not solved yet.,
Anders Rundgren
- RE: unqualified topic - not solved yet.,
Charles Moore
- Re: unqualified topic - not solved yet.,
Anders Rundgren
- RE: unqualified topic - not solved yet.,
Charles Moore
- RE: unqualified topic - not solved yet.,
Anders Rundgren
- RE: unqualified topic - not solved yet.,
Sharon Boeyen
- RE: unqualified topic - not solved yet.,
Charles Moore
- RE: unqualified topic - not solved yet.,
David P. Kemp
- Re: dnQualifier topic - not solved yet.,
Anders Rundgren
- Server-signatures: Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round,
Anders Rundgren
- IPSec 2000,
Peter Lewis
- proposed key usaged text -- the final round,
Russ Housley
- Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round,
Ed Gerck
- Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round,
Denis Pinkas
- Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round,
Stefan Santesson
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round,
Aram Perez
- RE: proposed key usaged text -- the final round,
Linn, John
- RE: proposed key usaged text -- the final round,
Peter Williams
- RE: proposed key usaged text -- the final round,
Linn, John
- Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round,
Aram Perez
- Re: proposed key usaged text -- the final round,
Aram Perez
- inhibitAnyPolicy extension,
tomaz
- Question:Authority Information Access,
Hiroyuki Sakakibara
- RE: We have to choose serialNumber instead of dnQualifier NOW!!!,
Peter Williams
- Re: Re: Certificate Policy vs Certification Practice .. where are the boundaries? ... what belongs where?,
Winchel 'Todd' Vincent, III
- signing entity in X.509,
Ed Gerck
- Re: Unknown private verisign extension,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: NR Signing-Entity vs Certificate-Subject,
tgindin
- We have to choose serialNumber instead of dnQualifier NOW!!!,
Stefan Santesson
- somewhat related timer discussion with geoplex,
Lynn.Wheeler
- FIPS 186 and X9.42: One of these things is not like the other,
Peter Gutmann
- MOTION ON NR,
Ed Gerck
- Re: MOTION ON NR,
Russ Housley
- Re: MOTION ON NR,
Tony Bartoletti
- Re: MOTION ON NR,
Irene Gassko
- Re: MOTION ON NR,
Tony Bartoletti
- Re: MOTION ON NR,
Ed Gerck
- Re: MOTION ON NR,
Russ Housley
- Re: MOTION ON NR,
Ed Gerck
- Re: MOTION ON NR,
Russ Housley
- Re: MOTION ON NR,
Ed Gerck
- Re: MOTION ON NR,
Tony Bartoletti
- NR Signing-Entity vs Certificate-Subject,
Tony Bartoletti
- Re: MOTION ON NR,
Ed Gerck
- Re: MOTION ON NR,
Russ Housley
- Re: MOTION ON NR,
Ed Gerck
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: MOTION ON NR,
Ed Gerck
- Re: MOTION ON NR,
ghilborn
- Passage of Electronic Signature/Electronic Commerce Bill,
TeamDaguio
- PKIX compliance tests,
Anne Anderson
- NR-Bit Truth-In-Advertising,
Tony Bartoletti
- RE: Certifiedtime.com,
Peter Williams
- Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text,
Ben.King
- Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text,
tgindin
- Re: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text,
David P. Kemp
- Re: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text,
Ed Gerck
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text,
Peter Williams
- RE: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text,
Peter Williams
- RE: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text,
Peter Williams
- RE: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text,
Peter Williams
- Re: Certificate Policy vs Certification Practice .. where are the boundaries? ... what belongs where?,
Winchel 'Todd' Vincent, III
- RFC 2527 Revision: What's going on and how to subscribe,
torrent
- Re: correction, was Re: proposed key usage text,
Ed Gerck
- Should we make the cert Validity field optional?,
Peter Gutmann
- proposed key usage text,
Tim Polk
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: proposed key usage text,
Aram Perez
- Re: proposed key usage text,
tgindin
- Re: proposed key usage text,
tgindin
- Re: proposed key usage text,
Tony Bartoletti
- Re: proposed key usage text,
Tony Bartoletti
- Re: proposed key usage text,
Peter Gutmann
- Re: proposed key usage text,
Stefan Santesson
- non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text,
Ed Gerck
- Re: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text,
Stefan Santesson
- Re: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text,
Ed Gerck
- Re: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text,
Russ Housley
- Re: non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text,
Ed Gerck
- Re: proposed key usage text,
Tony Bartoletti
- Re: proposed key usage text,
David P. Kemp
- non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text,
Ed Gerck
- Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usagetext,
Stephen Kent
- Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usagetext,
Ed Gerck
- Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed keyusagetext,
Stephen Kent
- Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed keyusagetext,
Ed Gerck
- Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposedkeyusagetext,
Stephen Kent
- Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text,
Al Arsenault
- Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text,
Ed Gerck
- Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text,
Al Arsenault
- Re: non-ephemeral vs. non-repudiation, was Re: proposed key usage text,
Ed Gerck
- Re: proposed key usage text,
Russ Housley
- Re: proposed key usage text,
Aram Perez
- Re: proposed key usage text,
Lynn.Wheeler
- Re: proposed key usage text,
Tony Bartoletti
- Re: proposed key usage text,
Aram Perez
- Re: proposed key usage text,
Aram Perez
- Re: proposed key usage text,
Aram Perez
- RE: proposed key usage text,
Heimberg, Jim
- Forward-dated entries in a CRL,
Salz, Rich
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-pkix-generalname-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- RE: PKIX: Use of dnQualifier must be settled,
Manger, James
- Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key,
Trevor Freeman (Exchange)
- Re: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key,
Stephen Farrell
- Re: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key,
Paul Koning
- Re: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key,
Andrew Farrell
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key,
Trevor Freeman (Exchange)
- RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key,
Trevor Freeman (Exchange)
- RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key,
Trevor Freeman (Exchange)
- RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key,
Trevor Freeman (Exchange)
- RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key,
David P. Kemp
- Re: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key,
Bob Jueneman
- RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key,
Peter Williams
- RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key,
Santosh Chokhani
- RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key,
Peter Williams
- RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key,
Trevor Freeman (Exchange)
- RE: Associating symmetric algorithms with a public key,
Trevor Freeman (Exchange)
- Extension Order,
Scott, Greg
- FW: Check this out quickly and respond!,
Luo, Feng (Exchange)
- ASN.1 question to PKIHeader in CMP (RFC 2510),
Anette Byskov
- Stupid Q. re. PKCs and Directories,
Anders Rundgren
- dnQualifier,
Ella P. Gardner
- [no subject],
Kirby Russell
- Use of dnQualifier in QC/2459 {Re: Use of dnQualifier in the QC profile},
Anders Rundgren
- Re: Update of the QC personalData issue,
Bob Jueneman
- Use of dnQualifier in the QC profile,
Stefan Santesson
- Policy Authority Control,
Andy Dowling
- AC ASN.1,
Andy Dowling
- QC/Son-of-2459 "key-container-info",
Anders Rundgren
- Static Identifiers {Re: Update of the QC personalData issue},
Anders Rundgren
- dnQualifier is used incorrectly,
Manger, James
- PKIX: employee/member/customer/org number attributes,
Manger, James
- Model PKI Disclosure Statement (PDS),
Stefan Santesson
- Update of the QC personalData issue (errata),
Stefan Santesson
- QC container ID support,
Anders Rundgren
- IMPORTANT info for those who is staying in OMNI Shoreham. Please read.,
Michael Zolotarev
- Licensed Certification Authorities in USA,
Sungjin Lee
- Timestamp: 04: comments,
Manger, James
- [no subject],
Patterson, G. Shaun
- [no subject],
Patterson, G. Shaun
- time-stamp ASN.1 module,
Nick Pope
- Washington PKIX Agenda,
Warwick Ford
- QC: VERISIGN uses UIDs!,
Anders Rundgren
- FYI: Announcement of a security requirements document for CAs,
David A. Cooper
- QC UID support must depart from RFC2459,
Anders Rundgren
- Agenda for wg,
Mike Williams
- Comparing rfc822 addresses to certificates,
Bob Jueneman
- NIST key-based management ANSI X9.44,
Sweigert, David
- RE: PKIX: String representation of GeneralName,
Manger, James
- Comments on draft-ietf-pkix-qc-02.txt,
Sean Turner
- Re: unsubscribe ietf-pkix@imc.org,
list-request
- How to identify certs to users,
Peter Gutmann
- US relaxed export policy - When/IF and how?,
Anders Rundgren
- PKI Software,
Eric Bomarsi
- error in previous post,
Miklos, Sue A.
- RE: SEIS: QC Container-ID (card serial),
Simon Corell
- Fresh version of the EU draft Electronic Signature directive,
Stefan Santesson
- QC Container-ID (card serial),
Anders Rundgren
- Possible patent issue with UTCTime hack,
Marc Branchaud
- Timestamping Standards.,
Todd Glassey @ GMT
Page 1 of 7
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail
Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections
to this Web page, please send them to
phoffman@imc.org.