[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: requirements discussion

To: ietf-rtpsec@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: requirements discussion
From: David McGrew <mcgrew@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 16:27:30 -0700
Cc: Francois Audet <audet@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <AFC97135-6BF9-4C3A-B169-933E3E0F5CED@xxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-rtpsec/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-rtpsec.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-rtpsec-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <44405030.1010901@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AFC97135-6BF9-4C3A-B169-933E3E0F5CED@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-rtpsec@xxxxxxxxxxxx


I forgot an important requirement:

When the keying method is used to protect a SIP/SRTP application, theprotected application MUST work in all NAT traversal scenarios inwhich the unprotected application works.


Thanks Francois for the clarifications.

David

References:
- Requirements, First
  - From: Alan Johnston
- requirements discussion
  - From: David McGrew

Prev by Date: RE: requirements discussion
Previous by thread: requirements discussion
Next by thread: RE: Requirements, First
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread