[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [MMUSIC] RE: alternate RTP profiles in SDP offer/answer
> > Sec 8.4.2 of RFC3388 suggests that the offer re-try without
> > That may not look good, but is not too bad either.
> That probably works alright with RTSP, but doesn't work with
> SIP forking due to HERFP (Heterogeneous Error Response
> Forking Problem).
HERFP is a problem with SIP that anyways needs to be solved at some
> > Those end points which crash when they look at transport overloaded
> > "m=" lines are anyways faulty s/w implementations and it is
> > that majority of deployed s/w is unstable to such an
> extent. And with
> > the (majority of good) end points that do not crash, it is
> possible to
> > continue the session.
> > In any case, not supporting the fallback approach suggested
> by RFC3388
> > is risky.
> > > -d
> > >