RE: [MMUSIC] RE: alternate RTP profiles in SDP offer/answer

["Desineni, Harikishan" <hdesinen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> > Sec 8.4.2 of RFC3388 suggests that the offer re-try without 
> "group".  
> > That may not look good, but is not too bad either.
> 
> That probably works alright with RTSP, but doesn't work with 
> SIP forking due to HERFP (Heterogeneous Error Response 
> Forking Problem).
> 

HERFP is a problem with SIP that anyways needs to be solved at some
other place. 

> -d
> 
> 
> > Those end points which crash when they look at transport overloaded 
> > "m=" lines are anyways faulty s/w implementations and it is 
> unlikely 
> > that majority of deployed s/w is unstable to such an 
> extent. And with 
> > the (majority of good) end points that do not crash, it is 
> possible to 
> > continue the session.
> >  
> > In any case, not supporting the fallback approach suggested 
> by RFC3388 
> > is risky.
> > 
> > > -d
> > > 
>