[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FIPS-140 required?

To: "Dan Wing" <dwing@xxxxxxxxx>, <ietf-rtpsec@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: FIPS-140 required?
From: Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 13:18:38 -0500
In-reply-to: <095d01c7419c$fa9d60b0$c5f0200a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-rtpsec/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-rtpsec.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-rtpsec-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <095d01c7419c$fa9d60b0$c5f0200a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-rtpsec@xxxxxxxxxxxx

I would like to see it be possible to get FIPS 140 validation of theimplementation. Some markets will not care, but others will.


Russ

At 05:54 PM 1/26/2007, Dan Wing wrote:

Is anyone seeing a requirement for FIPS-140 for products that implement
SRTP?

(FIPS 140-2 is "Security Requirements for Cryptographic Modules",
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips140-2/fips1402.pdf )

-d

References:
- FIPS-140 required?
  - From: Dan Wing

Prev by Date: RTP UDP audio max packet size per codec
Previous by thread: Re: FIPS-140 required?
Next by thread: RTP UDP audio max packet size per codec
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread