[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: RTPSec BOF proposal for IETF 68

To: "'Hannes Tschofenig'" <Hannes.Tschofenig@xxxxxxx>, "'Michael Richardson'" <mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: RTPSec BOF proposal for IETF 68
From: "Dan Wing" <dwing@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 21:51:30 -0800
Authentication-results: sj-dkim-5; header.From=dwing@xxxxxxxxx; dkim=pass (s ig from cisco.com/sjdkim5002 verified; );
Cc: "'Cullen Jennings'" <fluffy@xxxxxxxxx>, <ietf-rtpsec@xxxxxxx>, "'Lakshminath Dondeti'" <ldondeti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2168; t=1170827492; x=1171691492; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim5002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=dwing@xxxxxxxxx; z=From:=20=22Dan=20Wing=22=20<dwing@xxxxxxxxx> |Subject:=20RE=3A=20RTPSec=20BOF=20proposal=20for=20IETF=2068 |Sender:=20; bh=VofbcbpdRHxdDdhn76DDvw78F7rh60jvv8SFqsF/lw0=; b=gMgxH5cvzqUyx/aF+070gU64capxuGRfsxkuJC1NN+2HhUg1dl4wlIsyJFr7TP1sBgQsB+aj FF6T3ynrzskelPwskPXBTa7hRLXc4Ocy2vBsvSr0m969N2bCMiO1TbLh;
In-reply-to: <45C8E7B6.1040304@xxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-rtpsec/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-rtpsec.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-rtpsec-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-ietf-rtpsec@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcdKLwrknMoFqVrQSjyoXb7QlNZvQgATPfOw

Thanks,
-d
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:Hannes.Tschofenig@xxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 12:40 PM
> To: Michael Richardson
> Cc: Dan Wing; 'Cullen Jennings'; ietf-rtpsec@xxxxxxx; 
> 'Lakshminath Dondeti'
> Subject: Re: RTPSec BOF proposal for IETF 68
> 
> I am working on a draft update of 
> draft-wing-media-security-requirements-00.txt that includes something 
> like "evaluation criteria".
> The draft should be ready in a few days.
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
> Michael Richardson wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> >   
> >>>>>> "Dan" == Dan Wing <dwing@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >>>>>>             
> >     Lakshminath> Next, do we have a consensus set of 
> evaluation criteria
> >     Lakshminath> now to weigh the solution drafts against?  
> It would be
> >     Lakshminath> good to publish that soon in some form 
> (probably as an
> >     Lakshminath> update to Dan and Francois's draft?)
> >
> >     mcr> I didn't think we had reached that point yet.
> >
> >     Dan> Please elaborate.
> >
> >   I didn't think that we got to the point of having 
> evaluation criteria.
> >   
> > - -- 
> > ]            Bear: "Me, I'm just the shape of a bear."      
>     |  firewalls  [
> > ]   Michael Richardson,    Xelerance Corporation, Ottawa, 
> ON    |net architect[
> > ] mcr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx      
> http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/mcr/ |device driver[
> > ] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel 
> hacking, security guy"); [
> >
> >
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
> > Comment: Finger me for keys
> >
> > iQEVAwUBRciNRoCLcPvd0N1lAQLOigf6Amzc7ta7u552gsSx0uGkwIbxgkrSPYhu
> > 1AoCyaQ1nBN7Cym3J5i62fEHwFVa2wbbNpwlmEOu9/kPTFHhlUyCDULXd/KbMKt0
> > EqxjQr8RAHY/oRFrolMyz6M7OnsIq2xQdgh8Xc07uKmHFQbEpXfmtj3GS4Nn03la
> > e6Um/kDtX/zwdiXGFXmF4FaJ6tjGrx2Mb3G2cHT4gj063G0ULw9rO30c5nRhBig7
> > yCI3Lj3UzLuHk1Zi0FOmNttuKN+Ze8RKXjuqlscnJ6r4tGP2+S9L7aETKD4k1unS
> > pWTFNNoEEfC6akPRD0j/Xg/YryQQ03V+SR9vLghh09m67uhu6HGJoQ==
> > =LBi5
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >

References:
- Re: RTPSec BOF proposal for IETF 68
  - From: Hannes Tschofenig

Prev by Date: Re: RTPSec BOF proposal for IETF 68
Next by Date: RE: Early arriving media before 200 OK
Previous by thread: Re: RTPSec BOF proposal for IETF 68
Next by thread: RE: RTPSec BOF proposal for IETF 68
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread