[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Posting in support for Protcol X, Y, or Z
>>Does that requirement cover transcoders, media mixers and SBCs, which
>>may terminate the media, meaning that the media will be de-encrypted,
>>and forwarded possibly using another format/codec?
>Somewhat; it would depend on how each end authenticates it is
>talking to the correct device. For example, if I was using
>RFC4474 and using DTLS-SRTP, a transcoder under the control
>f my enterprise could be invoked _before the RFC4474
>signature was created_, and my enterprise would attest the
>call is coming from me (which it is, through their
>transcoder). I expect ZRTP would fail SAS validation in this
>similar situation. I don't know what MIKEYv2 would do.
>Can you write up the specific requirement so it can be
>included in the update to draft-wing-media-security-requirements?
I think I did propose a new requirement earlier, didn't I? I don't know
whether it needs to be more clear, but it did say that the solution must
support the presence of these kind of middleboxes.