Philip Zimmermann <prz@xxxxxxx> writes:
Yes, it is unusual. I'm using unusual methods to achieve a difficult
objective. If anyone has concerns about this, see me. I'd be
happy to
explain it, and listen to your concerns. If You have any
suggestions, I'm
listening.
One part of the comment that I (IANAL) find confusing is this:
"As used herein, Qualified Parties means a party who has not, does
not and
will not assert, in litigation or otherwise, including in licensing
discussions, any patent or other intellectual property right
against PRZ of
any nature, or assert the same against any licensee of the libZRTP
SDK in
connection with such licensee's implementation or practice of any IETF
standard incorporating the ZRTP Technology."
Perhaps lawyers read it differently, but "any patent or other
intellectual
property right against PRZ of any nature" doesn't seem to be
limited to
issues revolving around ZRTP and the IETF spec (as is explicitly
done with
licensees). So, to give a random example: IBM agrees to use ZRTP.
IBM
cannot now in any way use *any* patent against PRZ. PRZ is
acquired by
(say) Samsung. Now IBM can't use *any* patent against Samsung
(without
losing it's license to use ZRTP).
Was this intentional? Do I read this right?
--
Randell Jesup, Worldgate (developers of the Ojo videophone), ex-
Amiga OS team
rjesup@xxxxxxxxx
"The fetters imposed on liberty at home have ever been forged out
of the weapons
provided for defence against real, pretended, or imaginary dangers
from abroad."
- James Madison, 4th US president (1751-1836)