RE: Media Security Requirements Draft

["Christer Holmberg (JO/LMF)" <christer.holmberg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

In a previous thread (RE: Fwd: I-D
ACTION:draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-03.txt), when we were discussing
middleboxes, Dan proposed a requirement saying something like:

"A solution MUST NOT expect packets to be received on the media path
until 200 OK, because the media path will be blocked by middleboxes 
until the 200 OK."

(I proposed to change "will be blocked" to "may be blocked")

However, I can't find this requirement in the latest version of the reqs
draft.

Regards,

Christer
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ietf-rtpsec@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-ietf-rtpsec@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
> Sent: 30. toukokuuta 2007 0:33
> To: ietf-rtpsec@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Media Security Requirements Draft
> 
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> we have published another version of the requirements draft:
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-wing-media-security-requirements-03.txt
> 
> The changes in the draft are focused on the following requirement:
> 
> R27:   If SRTP keying is performed over the media path, the keying
>            packets MUST NOT pass the RTP validity check defined in
>            Appendix A.1 of [RFC3550
> <http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3550.txt>]
> 
> It seems that we are getting to an end with the requirements work.
> 
> Ciao
> Hannes
> 
>