[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Plan for moving forward


Dan,
In a few of the emails in this thread, I mentioned 3GPP and 3GPP2. So it is inaccurate to say "unspecified organization." Anyway, it appears that we have moved past having a professional conversation. 

Lakshminath

On 6/12/2007 5:39 PM, Dan Wing wrote:




-----Original Message-----
From: Lakshminath Dondeti [mailto:ldondeti@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 5:05 PM 
To: Dan Wing
Cc: 'Eric Rescorla'; 'Matt Lepinski'; ietf-rtpsec@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Plan for moving forward

Dan,
I resumed this thread after collecting additional feedback. If you are looking for a concrete reference, there isn't any to my knowledge. I am not saying you have to take my word for it. I am just pointing to places where I have checked.
I am sorry to hear there were failures in the past in some unspecified standards organization. As it seems we can't learn anything from this previous failure due to lack of detail about it, we can only forge onward with the information at hand: that creating a public/private key on a device and wrapping a certificate around it is easy and can be done on any device capable of being a VoIP endpoint. 

-d



thanks,
Lakshminath

On 6/12/2007 3:55 PM, Dan Wing wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: Lakshminath Dondeti [mailto:ldondeti@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 2:44 PM 
To: Dan Wing
Cc: 'Eric Rescorla'; 'Matt Lepinski'; ietf-rtpsec@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Plan for moving forward
Apologies. I had another email in my head and I wrote a shorter version (since Eric asked I have sent some emails to people asking for their recollection of the history, just in case I don't have my facts straight). 
I'll wait for that additional detail.  Without that, I don't
see a substantive argument against self-signed certificates.

-d