[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: DTLS-SRTP harming GETS [was RE: Additional use cases? (Re: Plan for moving forward)]

To: "Eric Rescorla" <ekr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Lakshminath Dondeti" <ldondeti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: DTLS-SRTP harming GETS [was RE: Additional use cases? (Re: Plan for moving forward)]
From: "Francois Audet" <audet@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:57:39 -0500
Cc: "Dan Wing" <dwing@xxxxxxxxx>, "Jonathan Rosenberg" <jdrosen@xxxxxxxxx>, "Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig@xxxxxxx>, <ietf-rtpsec@xxxxxxx>, "Sam Hartman" <hartmans-ietf@xxxxxxx>, "Tim Polk" <tim.polk@xxxxxxxx>, <jon.peterson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20070613031439.8F80B33C55@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-rtpsec/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-rtpsec.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-rtpsec-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <028c01c7ad51$d6380420$c2f0200a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <466F4F84.1020400@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20070613031439.8F80B33C55@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-rtpsec@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcetaSTY7R6d5Jc1QWOgICYME9hpGAAaluDQ
Thread-topic: DTLS-SRTP harming GETS [was RE: Additional use cases? (Re: Plan for moving forward)]

> > The only argument against that I see so far is that 
> DTLS-SRTP is the 
> > chosen protocol and the chosen protocol must not be changed.

Didn't we agree on this at the last meeting?

Isn't it time to move on?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DTLS-SRTP harming GETS [was RE: Additional use cases? (Re: Plan for moving forward)]
  - From: Lakshminath Dondeti

References:
- DTLS-SRTP harming GETS [was RE: Additional use cases? (Re: Plan for moving forward)]
  - From: Dan Wing
- Re: DTLS-SRTP harming GETS [was RE: Additional use cases? (Re: Plan for moving forward)]
  - From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: DTLS-SRTP harming GETS [was RE: Additional use cases? (Re: Plan for moving forward)]
  - From: Eric Rescorla

Prev by Date: Re: DTLS-SRTP harming GETS [was RE: Additional use cases? (Re: Plan for moving forward)]
Next by Date: Re: DTLS-SRTP harming GETS [was RE: Additional use cases? (Re: Plan for moving forward)]
Previous by thread: Re: DTLS-SRTP harming GETS [was RE: Additional use cases? (Re: Plan for moving forward)]
Next by thread: Re: DTLS-SRTP harming GETS [was RE: Additional use cases? (Re: Plan for moving forward)]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread