RE: [Sip] DTLS-SRTP - more work for the SIP group

["Dan Wing" <dwing@xxxxxxxxx>]

I support this plan.  

To that end, the authors of draft-wing-media-security-requirements and
draft-wing-rtpsec-keying-eval have combined the documents into one document,
and added Brian Stucker as another co-author of this joint document,

 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wing-media-security-requirements-05.
txt
  "Requirements and Analysis of Media Security Key Management Protocols"

   Abstract:
   A number of proposals have been published to address the need of
   securing media traffic.  A summary of the proposals available at that
   time is available in the appendix of this document.  Different
   assumptions, requirements, and usage environments justify every one
   of them.  This document aims to summarize the discussed media
   security requirements.  A comparison of the requirements against the
   individual proposals is provided.

-d

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) [mailto:drage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 11:41 AM
> To: sip@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Sip] DTLS-SRTP - more work for the SIP group
> 
> (As WG co-chair)
> 
> You may remember that some time ago some work was identified that
> crossed multiple working groups in the RAI area on the above subject.
> Cullen took this ball away and played with it in a RAI BOF and there
> came to some consensus on the way forward and what documentation was
> required.
> 
> However we now need to put that work through real working 
> groups to get
> it to IESG so we are reallocating it to working groups.
> 
> I have requested milestones as follows:
> 
> Sep 2007	Requirements for media keying to WGLC (Informational)
> Nov 2007	Requirements for media keying to IESG (Informational)
> 
> This will be WG milestones in support of progressing
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wing-media-security-
> requiremen
> ts-04.txt
> And incorporating
> draft-wing-rtpsec-keying-eval
> 
> This charter item will essentially be a discussion of how we got where
> we are now. It is therefore not the most earthshattering document, but
> it has been considered valuable to retain some permanent record and an
> informational RFC is the way to do this.
> 
> Dec 2007	Establishment of secure media sessions using DTLS-SRTP
> to WGLC (PS)
> Feb 2008	Establishment of secure media sessions using DTLS-SRTP
> to IESG (PS)
> 
> This will be WG milestones in support of progressing
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fischl-sipping-media
> -dtls-03.t
> xt
> 
> This charter item goes to SIP because it is security related, rather
> than to SIPPING. This is one deliverable out of a package of 3, the
> other two being:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp-00.txt
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fischl-mmusic-sdp-dt
> ls-03.txt
> 
> Which will be handled by AVT and MMUSIC respectively.
> 
> What do you need to do as SIP WG members
> ----------------------------------------
> 
> Provide consensus or not to move these drafts forward.
> 
> Do you agree with the identified author drafts above forming the basis
> of these charter items listed above? If not please express your
> objections to the list, with appropriate technical considerations.
> Indications of support are appropriate as well, particularly 
> if you have
> a technical point you wish to make (alternatively address the 
> WG chairs
> with just "Yes I support").
> 
> Responses please within a calendar week, i.e. by Tuesday 25th 
> September
> 2007, unless there is a feeling that more time and discussion are
> needed.
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Keith
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use sip-implementors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions on current sip
> Use sipping@xxxxxxxx for new developments on the application of sip