[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
One "record" per datagram when the "use_srtp" extension is in effect
- To: ietf-rtpsec@xxxxxxx
- Subject: One "record" per datagram when the "use_srtp" extension is in effect
- From: "Martin Vladić" <martin.vladic@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 15:35:36 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=7hGcf5U+ZpOnEMhvn64FaYYxuebsYX5j2tikGzTTb0k=; b=Pz2uS/vvu6OtMfxNr013is0us0x8mtV7rtwZ9ev8sJd6ujGigkYGCzGLyMHODAJtzSEZcw8bs1t29X/n5KjizE48eORTWgUcAjqagBv5OLOAx6qFxnVQJ358B0jjuEtebb6zsY48B6j/BgPfwyos4x8DizsnXJhRlr8IsIImA5g=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=eOri/s/su+t1TSNoPpHkXyoScJNHwyEAuDKb6CsBCPZqIImGlgfOpE2HRvXCoXY56m9ySGcjr97O/QCmxJuBjPpu0mmueXS5DTcOcit2BfAVUIdQMTYFbF17CWPR8EPL1gcs6KCZp5wAkHA+xmTpyk3Ua5xCgstRVcsriKbJKjg=
- List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-rtpsec/mail-archive/>
- List-id: <ietf-rtpsec.imc.org>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-rtpsec-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
- Sender: owner-ietf-rtpsec@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
I have a question for the authors of draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp. In
section 4.1 of this draft it states:
"When the "use_srtp" extension is in effect, implementations MUST NOT
place more than one "record" per datagram. (This is only meaningful
from the perspective of DTLS because SRTP is inherently oriented
towards one payload per packet, but is stated purely for
clarification.)"
For what reason implementations must not place more than one "record"
per datagram?
Thanks,
Martin