Peter Gutmann wrote: > If you're not being forced to use PKCS #12 for interop reasons, I'd go with a > PKCS #15 soft-token, which is a much nicer format. Interop is the main attraction to PKCS-12. Something that existing secure applications can import and export. If they support, or could easily (be extended to) support, a PKCS-15 soft-token then that'd be a good way to go. > Peter.