Re: New versions of SACRED I-Ds; recommending consideration for RFCs

["Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In message <>, "Nystrom, Magnus" wr
ites:
>Dear Steve,
>
>As a response to your pre-IESG, Area Director "nits", Stephen and I have
>now submitted new versions of SACRED's framework and protocol I-D,
>versions that we hope will meet your earlier comments.
>
>Below is a summary of the changes made to the framework document; the
>protocol document has a list of changes included in it.
>
>Due to the nature of these changes we do not intend to re-open the WG L-C
>on these documents, instead we ask that they be considered by you and the
>IETF secretariat for publication as RFCs.
>

I agree -- no new LC is needed.  When they pop in the repository, I'll 
look at them again.


		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)