Re: New work for sacred working group?

[pgut001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Gutmann)]

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>Does the lack of response mean that there's no longer much interest in using
>schemes like SPEKE for credential download or that no-one's reading this list
>anymore?

I'm reading it, but purely in passive mode.  In theory I'd be strongly opposed
to the use of any crippled/patented technology in Sacred (particularly when
there are unencumbered alternatives available), but since I'm not an
implementor it's really just a personal opinion.

Peter.