Re: AD Review for draft-ietf-sasl-gssapi-xx.txt

[Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@xxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

> > Uh, how does that follow?  The original comment was that to meet (5),
> > we needed to require that integ_req_flag be set.  The sole effect of
> > the proposed change is to _remove_ the requirement that that flag be set.
>
> No, the new text requires that this flag is set unconditionally.

You're right; it does.  I completely missed that sentence, somehow.