Milestones in my most recent charter proposal were:
Done initial document moving DIGEST-MD5 to Historic
Sep 2007 WGLC document moving DIGEST-MD5 to Historic
Oct 2007 initial implementation report questionnaire
Oct 2007 initial RFC4422bis correcting references, etc.
Oct 2007 initial document for DIGEST-MD5 successor
Nov 2007 DIGEST-MD5 to Historic to IESG
Jan 2008 send out implementation report questionnaire
Feb 2008 compile implementation report questionnaire responses
Feb 2008 WGLC RFC4422bis
Feb 2008 WGLC DIGEST-MD5 successor
Mar 2008 discuss implementation report questionnaire results
Apr 2008 final implementation report
Apr 2008 RFC4422bis to IESG
Apr 2008 DIGEST-MD5 successor to IESG
Given that we've slipped on a number of these so far, I suggest that
we move them by three or four months. Given the holiday season, I
would prefer adding four months rather than three, but I am open to
opinions either way. Which would people prefer?