[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: new milestones for charter update

To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: new milestones for charter update
From: Tom Yu <tlyu@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:12:47 -0500
Cc: ietf-sasl@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <476AD3F5.9020400@xxxxxxxxx> (Alexey Melnikov's message of "Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:43:33 +0000")
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-sasl/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-sasl.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-sasl-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <ldvfxxzoouv.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <476AD3F5.9020400@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-sasl@xxxxxxxxxxxx

>>>>> "Alexey" == Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

Alexey> But I would really like to have more or less solid SCRAM
Alexey> document before we obsolete DIGEST-MD5.

How solid does the DIGEST-MD5 successor document need to be?  Does
anyone else believe that we should delay publication of
digest-to-historic until we have a solid document for the DIGEST-MD5
successor?  I would prefer to not introduce more dependencies than
absolutely necessary.

---Tom

References:
- new milestones for charter update
  - From: Tom Yu
- Re: new milestones for charter update
  - From: Alexey Melnikov

Prev by Date: Re: new milestones for charter update
Next by Date: Re: IETF70 SASL summary
Previous by thread: Re: new milestones for charter update
Next by thread: Channel Binding and GSS-API mechanisms
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread