[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: which is our DIGEST-MD5 successor?

To: Simon Josefsson <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: which is our DIGEST-MD5 successor?
From: Tom Yu <tlyu@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:28:27 -0400
Cc: "Frank Ellermann" <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@xxxxxxxxx>, ietf-sasl@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <87hcfd8p0o.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Simon Josefsson's message of "Tue, 11 Mar 2008 12:43:19 +0100")
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-sasl/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-sasl.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-sasl-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <ldvhcfeqosf.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87od9mb3ht.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fr51no$jdj$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87hcfd8p0o.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-sasl@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Simon Josefsson <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Thanks.  SCRAM is not a GSS-API mechanism as far as I can tell, so I
> believe we have different goals.  I guess it is up to the WG to decide
> whether to base the password mechanism on GSS-API or not.

We have consensus to attempt making the new password-based mechanism a
valid GS2 mechanism (and thus also a valid GSS-API mechanism), only
specifying it in a way allowing for implementation without reference
to the GSS-API specs.

---Tom

References:
- which is our DIGEST-MD5 successor?
  - From: Tom Yu
- Re: which is our DIGEST-MD5 successor?
  - From: Simon Josefsson
- Re: which is our DIGEST-MD5 successor?
  - From: Frank Ellermann
- Re: which is our DIGEST-MD5 successor?
  - From: Simon Josefsson

Prev by Date: Re: which is our DIGEST-MD5 successor?
Previous by thread: Re: which is our DIGEST-MD5 successor?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread