Re: which is our DIGEST-MD5 successor?

[Tom Yu <tlyu@xxxxxxx>]

"Frank Ellermann" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> A somewhat longer version:  I don't trust SHA-*, I
> think that folks wanting SHA-* claiming that it is
> "better" often miss more than one point, I don't
> have the 30..100K USD for a certificate (see SAAG
> thread), and I don't like the SHA-* patent.  

Could you please elaborate on the SHA-* patent?  I only see one
message in the SAAG mailing list recently about that patent, and that
references an IPR notice claiming that the NSA makes the patent
available royalty-free.

---Tom