[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: which is our DIGEST-MD5 successor?

To: ietf-sasl@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: which is our DIGEST-MD5 successor?
From: "Frank Ellermann" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 22:36:21 +0100
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-sasl/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-sasl.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-sasl-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Organization: <http://purl.net/xyzzy>
References: <ldvhcfeqosf.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><87od9mb3ht.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fr51no$jdj$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx><87hcfd8p0o.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fr638g$vgu$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ldvk5k9l2er.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: "Frank Ellermann" <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-sasl@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Tom Yu wrote:

> that references an IPR notice claiming that the NSA makes
> the patent available royalty-free.

If you are talking about the IPR statement submitted by
Simon based on a report from a conference discussing hash
functions, that is what I had in mind:
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/795/>
<http://www.google.com/patents?q=6829355>

I only looked once in the NIST PDF referenced by RFC 4634.
Just copying the example code "as is" might be not good
enough for some applications:  IANAL.

 Frank

References:
- which is our DIGEST-MD5 successor?
  - From: Tom Yu
- Re: which is our DIGEST-MD5 successor?
  - From: Simon Josefsson
- Re: which is our DIGEST-MD5 successor?
  - From: Frank Ellermann
- Re: which is our DIGEST-MD5 successor?
  - From: Simon Josefsson
- Re: which is our DIGEST-MD5 successor?
  - From: Frank Ellermann
- Re: which is our DIGEST-MD5 successor?
  - From: Tom Yu

Prev by Date: Re: Clarifying the qualities we desire the DIGEST-MD5 replacement to have
Previous by thread: Re: which is our DIGEST-MD5 successor?
Next by thread: Re: which is our DIGEST-MD5 successor?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread