[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Crypto agility in SCRAM + draft-josefsson-password-auth?

To: Simon Josefsson <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Crypto agility in SCRAM + draft-josefsson-password-auth?
From: ned+ietf-sasl@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 20:54:50 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ned+ietf-sasl@xxxxxxxxxxx, Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@xxxxxxx>, ietf-sasl@xxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nowsp; d=mrochek.com; s=mauve; t=1206849330; h=From: Date:Subject:MIME-version:Content-type; b=DMd93RxITaLxD3ByuqAi7Pl9C Jo34STTL733FNLfgdhoPEIObknfPRTTqzCdyuf4nXSgXO7QKSbVFMUlhqWvNw==
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:58:29 +0100" <87skybq16i.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-sasl/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-sasl.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-sasl-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <87y784o3mn.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <01MSWZHOB0B800007A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87skybq16i.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-sasl@xxxxxxxxxxxx

> Maybe we can short-circuit this discussion.  Given the trade-offs here,
> I propose to use HMAC-SHA-1.  Would you or anyone else object to that?

I think HMAC-SHA-1 makes all kinds of sense.

				Ned

References:
- Re: Crypto agility in SCRAM + draft-josefsson-password-auth?
  - From: Chris Newman
- Re: Crypto agility in SCRAM + draft-josefsson-password-auth?
  - From: Simon Josefsson
- Re: Crypto agility in SCRAM + draft-josefsson-password-auth?
  - From: ned+ietf-sasl
- Re: Crypto agility in SCRAM + draft-josefsson-password-auth?
  - From: Simon Josefsson

Prev by Date: Re: Crypto agility in SCRAM + draft-josefsson-password-auth?
Previous by thread: Re: Crypto agility in SCRAM + draft-josefsson-password-auth?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread