[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Clarifying the qualities we desire the DIGEST-MD5 replacement to have




Kurt Zeilenga wrote:

A question came up off-list which I think needs to be explicitly addressed in the charter text.
    While the mechanism provide a security layer?

From list discussions, I think the answer is:
The replacement mechanism is expected not to provide a security layer itself, instead rely on security services provided at a lower layer (e.g., TLS) and channel bindings.

That is fine with me.
I might be in minority, but I would rather not have any text prohibiting development of a security layer.

I recommend inserting this sentence just before "The WG is expected to strike..." and deleting the "channel binding" quality.

Sure.

Also, as it is desirable to have a shorter list of qualities, I also recommend deleting "algorithm agility" and "minimal roundtrips" qualities.

Fine with me. Both are good practices, so we are unlikely to design a mechanism that maximizes the number of round trips, etc. ;-).