Re: Poll: pure SCRAM versa SCRAM-as-GS2

To: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Poll: pure SCRAM versa SCRAM-as-GS2
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 10:31:16 +0000
Cc: SASL WG <ietf-sasl@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20090206061900.GW9992@xxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-sasl/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-sasl.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-sasl-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <498B569C.7070400@xxxxxxxxx> <20090206061900.GW9992@xxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-sasl@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915


Nicolas Williams wrote:

Are the two versions supposed to be the same protocol, but described
differently?  Or are they different protocols?

The two versions are slightly different on the wire - GS2 versionrequires different layout, different MIC to protect authorizationidentity, etc.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Poll: pure SCRAM versa SCRAM-as-GS2
  - From: Nicolas Williams

References:
- Poll: pure SCRAM versa SCRAM-as-GS2
  - From: Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Poll: pure SCRAM versa SCRAM-as-GS2
  - From: Nicolas Williams