[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-sasl-channel-bindings-00.txt
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 02:03:47PM -0700, Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
> I generally do not favor changing RFC 4422 as discussed in this I-D.
> My view is that while GS2 mechanisms (such as SCRAM) handle channel in
> similar ways (by design), we should not impose any restriction that
> other mechanisms which support channel bindings do so in a like way.
> For instance, many of the suggested restrictions make little sense for
> YAP. Nor would they necessarily make sense for a "channel-bound"
> EXTERNAL mechanism (which, BTW, I have in the works).
Can you elaborate? Also, EXTERNAL is just not an issue.