[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-sasl-channel-bindings-00.txt
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 09:03:20AM -0700, Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2009, at 7:45 AM, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> >I actually changed that in -02 since that makes no sense for YAP.
> >Please look at -02.
> The above text is from -02. As is the IANA consideration:
> Henceforth any SASL mechanism registration MUST indicate ... two
> mechanism names and an indication of which name indicates
> server support for channel binding.
"...and, if the mechanism supports optional channel binding then c)
two mechanism names and an indication of which name indicates server
support for channel binding."
Note the "and, if..." clause.