Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-sasl-channel-bindings-00.txt

[Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@xxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 09:03:20AM -0700, Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
> On Apr 16, 2009, at 7:45 AM, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> >I actually changed that in -02 since that makes no sense for YAP.
> >Please look at -02.
> 
> The above text is from -02.  As is the IANA consideration:
>   Henceforth any SASL mechanism registration MUST indicate ... two  
> mechanism names and an indication of which name indicates
> server support for channel binding.

Read carefully:

    "...and, if the mechanism supports optional channel binding then c)
    two mechanism names and an indication of which name indicates server
    support for channel binding."

Note the "and, if..." clause.