[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I-D Action:draft-ietf-sasl-channel-bindings-00.txt
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 09:46:11AM -0700, Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
> I did read it carefully. What you miss is that my concern is not just
> about YAP, it's about undue restrictions upon future mechanisms...
> The document precludes, for instance, a mechanism design in which
> different name for each type of channel binding the server is willing
> to accept (e.g, "FOO" v. "FOO-CB-END-POINT" v. "FOO-CB-UNIQUE").
How does it do that? Are we not free to add more rules later?