Re: Poll: use of TLS channel bindings in SCRAM

[Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@xxxxxxxxx>]

Kurt Zeilenga wrote:

> I hereby cancel the WGLC on this document as it is reasonably clear  
> that a lack of consensus exists as to the publication of the I-D as 
> it  currently reads.  I also intend to defer the WGLC on the GS2 
> document.
>
> I encourage the WG to respond to this poll.  The chairs will 
> determine  WG consensus of responses, including comments, including 
> discussions  not restricted to the variants listed.  The chairs will 
> also consider  off-list comments.  (Participants are of course free to 
> reach  independent conclusions of the responses they are aware of, 
> however  the chairs have not and will not delegated their RFC 2418  
> responsibilities in this area.)

Very well.

I would ask chairs to put a deadline for reaching the consensus on 
channel bindings, somewhere around 1 month, 2 months max.
I don't intend to participate in discussions in this document for 6 more 
months. If that happens, you will have my resignation as the editor of 
the document.