Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-sasl-scram-02

[Simon Josefsson <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@xxxxxxx> writes:

> --On Monday, July 27, 2009 03:17:20 PM +0200 Chris Newman
> <Chris.Newman@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Section 10:
>>>   SASL Mechanisms registry.  IANA is requested to prevent future
>>>   registrations of SASL mechanisms starting with SCRAM- without
>>>   consulting the SASL mailing list <ietf-sasl@xxxxxxx> first.
>>
>> This at least needs to designate a successor review process if
>> ietf-sasl@xxxxxxx goes away.
>
> I don't think it does.  There's plenty of precedent for setting up a
> mailing list as the reviewer; if the list goes away, the IESG can
> designate a new reviewer.

How about changing the e-mail address to sasl@xxxxxxxx so the e-mail
name is at least under the IETF's control?  The address can be a forward
to this list, if we for some reason don't want to move the list to
sasl@xxxxxxxx as well.

Thanks,
Simon