Simon Josefsson wrote:
Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@xxxxxxx> writes:I don't think this matters much, this is a WG mailing list and IETF has control over which mailing lists are used by WGs.--On Monday, July 27, 2009 03:17:20 PM +0200 Chris Newman <Chris.Newman@xxxxxxx> wrote:Section 10:SASL Mechanisms registry. IANA is requested to prevent future registrations of SASL mechanisms starting with SCRAM- without consulting the SASL mailing list <ietf-sasl@xxxxxxx> first.This at least needs to designate a successor review process if ietf-sasl@xxxxxxx goes away.I don't think it does. There's plenty of precedent for setting up a mailing list as the reviewer; if the list goes away, the IESG can designate a new reviewer.How about changing the e-mail address to sasl@xxxxxxxx so the e-mail name is at least under the IETF's control?
As a side note: I've talked to our AD Pasi (who talked to Paul Hoffman) and he said that in a few months this mailing list will migrate to @ietf.org.The address can be a forward to this list, if we for some reason don't want to move the list to sasl@xxxxxxxx as well.