All, On 6 April 2001, we provided a new 11.1 sample message requesting a signed receipt, but we neglected to provide the corresponding 11.2 sample signed receipt. A new 11.2 sample signed receipt is attached that we generated based on the 6 April 11.1 sample message. Thanks to Ronald 'Life is hard, and then you die' for catching our omission. =========================================== John Pawling, John.Pawling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Getronics Government Solutions, LLC =========================================== <<11.2.signedReceipt.bin>> > -----Original Message----- > From: Pawling, John > Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 3:19 PM > To: SMIME Examples List (E-mail) > Cc: Colestock, Robert > Subject: Corrected Samples for Examples-07 I-D > > All, > > In reply to several e-mail messages, Getronics Government Solutions has > used the S/MIME Freeware Library (SFL) to generate new corrected versions > (see below) of the following sample messages (attached). We propose that > these messages should be included in the next release (-07) of the > "Examples of S/MIME Messages" Internet-Draft. We still need to generate > corrected samples for sections 5.8, 5.9 and 6.8. We need to enhance our > MIME capabilities before generating those samples. Thanks to all who > provided feedback!! We look forward to further feedback. > > 1) We corrected the SFL to use the id-dsa-with-sha1 OID for DSA signatures > as specified in RFC 2630, Section 12.2.1. New samples including the > corrected OID are provided for sections 5.1, 5.3, 5.4, 5.6, 5.7, 5.10, > 11.1, 11.3, 11.4, 11.5, 11.6. Note: We generated new samples for all > DSA-signed messages including those submitted by Jim Schaad, because we > (and others) could not verify the signature of Jim's DSA-signed messages. > > 2) We corrected the SFL to properly implement the following requirement as > specified in RFC 2630, Section 12.3.1: "For key agreement of RC2 > key-encryption keys, 128 bits must be generated as input to the key > expansion process used to compute the RC2 effective key [RC2]." New > corrected samples are provided for sections 6.3, 6.7, 6.9, 6.10. The > sample for section 6.7 also included the correct KEKRecipientInfo version > value (4). > > 3) We were unable to use the BobPrivRSAEncrypt private key included in the > Examples-06 document. We are providing a new BobPrivRSAEncrypt private > key that can be used to decrypt the sample 6.2 message included in the > Examples-06 document. We are also providing a new BobRSASignByCarl > certificate. > > Paul: Recommend changing all occurrences of "DH-DSS" to "DSA" to be > consistent with RFC 2630. > > Thank you again for the feedback!! > > =========================================== > John Pawling, John.Pawling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Getronics Government Solutions, LLC > =========================================== > >
Attachment:
11.2.signedReceipt.bin
Description: Binary data