[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Status of the examples draft

To: <ietf-smime-examples@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Status of the examples draft
From: "Beauchamp, Sue" <Sue.Beauchamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:48:01 -0400
Cc: "Pawling, John" <John.Pawling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Bertapelle, Matt" <Matt.Bertapelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smime-examples/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-smime-examples.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smime-examples-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-ietf-smime-examples@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcNAszTjO8ShaR0ZS+mq4re6LgMMRwAACy1AAS0GpVA=
Thread-topic: Status of the examples draft

Hi,

I have tested all of the Examples-11 of S/MIME Messages that the SFL
supports.  All of the tests results were OK and no problems were found.


Sue Beauchamp
Sue.Beauchamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
DigitalNet (formerly Getronics Government Solutions)



-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Hoffman / IMC [mailto:phoffman@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 11:44 AM
To: ietf-smime-examples@xxxxxxx; ietf-smime@xxxxxxx
Subject: Status of the examples draft


Hi again. The -11 draft has the following changes:
5.1.bin
5.3.bin
5.4.bin
5.6.bin
5.7.bin
5.10.bin
8.2.bin
11.1.bin
11.2.bin

It would be great if everyone who has tested can re-test with these 
new examples.

BTW, I forgot to change the title of 6.3 to say RC2/128, and will do 
so in the -12 draft. (Just to be sure, I have already started the -12 
draft so I don't space out again...)

I would like to update the chart below for the -11 draft soon so we 
can move it to IETF last call.

======================================

Status of the examples in -10

4. Trivial Examples

4.1 ContentInfo with Data type, BER
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Jim Schaad: tested OK.
   Jeff Jacoby: tested OK.
   Holger Ebel: tested OK.

4.2 ContentInfo with Data type, DER
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Jim Schaad: tested OK.
   Jeff Jacoby: tested OK.
   Holger Ebel: tested OK.

5.  Signed-data
   Jim Schaad pointed out that many examples had the
     signatureAlgorithm of 1.2.840.10040.4.1 (dsa) but it should instead
     be 1.2.840.10040.4.3 (dsaWithSha1).
   The general decision was that the examples should have dsaWithSha1.
   John Pawling and Sue Beauchamp at DigitalNet agreed to re-generate
     the examples.

5.1 Basic signed content, DSS
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Blake Ramsdell: tested OK.
   Jim Schaad: failed.
     signatureAlgorithm is dsa but should be dsaWithSha1
   Holger Ebel: tested OK.
   Sue Beauchamp sent new example file.

5.2 Basic signed content, RSA
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Blake Ramsdell: tested OK.
   Jim Schaad: tested OK.
   Jeff Jacoby: tested OK.
   Holger Ebel: tested OK.

5.3 Basic signed content, detached content
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Blake Ramsdell: tested OK.
   Jim Schaad: failed.
	Contains Alice's RSA certificate
	No content hint unsigned attribute
     signatureAlgorithm is dsa but should be dsaWithSha1
   Jeff Jacoby: tested OK.
   Holger Ebel: tested OK.
   Sue Beauchamp sent new example file.

5.4 Fancier signed content
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Blake Ramsdell: tested OK.
   Jeff Jacoby: tested OK.
   Holger Ebel: tested OK.
     Countersigner is Alice, not Diane
     No content hint
   Sue Beauchamp sent new example file.

5.5 All RSA signed message
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Blake Ramsdell: tested OK.
   Jim Schaad: tested OK.
   Jeff Jacoby: tested OK.
   Holger Ebel: tested OK.

5.6 Multiple signers
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Blake Ramsdell: tested OK.
   Jim Schaad: failed.
     signatureAlgorithm is dsa but should be dsaWithSha1
   Holger Ebel: tested OK.
   Sue Beauchamp sent new example file.

5.7 Signing using SKI
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Blake Ramsdell: tested OK.
   Jim Schaad: failed.
     signatureAlgorithm is dsa but should be dsaWithSha1
   Holger Ebel: tested OK.
   Sue Beauchamp sent new example file.

5.8 S/MIME multipart/signed message
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Blake Ramsdell: tested OK.
   Holger Ebel: tested OK except that it has a CRLF prepended.

5.9 S/MIME application/pkcs7-mime signed message
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Blake Ramsdell: tested OK.
   Jim Schaad: failed because signatureAlgorithm of dsa not dsaWithSha1
   Holger Ebel: tested OK except that it has a CRLF prepended.

5.10 SignedData With Attributes
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Blake Ramsdell: tested OK.
   Jim Schaad: failed.
	Change "unknown OID" to "unknown OID (1.2.5555)"
	Content Hint should have an OID of 1.2.840.113549.1.7.1
	Content Identifier attribute absent
	Contains Security Label attribute
	Contains encrypt key preference attribute
	Contains ML Expansion History attribute
	Contains Equivalent Label attribute
   Jeff Jacoby: tested OK.
   Holger Ebel: failed (not signed by Alice).

5.11 SignedData with Certificates Only
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Blake Ramsdell: tested OK.
   Jeff Jacoby: tested OK.
   Holger Ebel: tested OK.

6.  Enveloped-data

6.1 Basic encrypted content, TripleDES and DH
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Holger Ebel: tested OK.

6.2 Basic encrypted content, TripleDES and RSA
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Blake Ramsdell: tested OK.
   Jeff Jacoby: tested OK.
   Holger Ebel: tested OK.

6.3 Basic encrypted content, RC2/40 and RSA
   Blake Ramsdell: this is actually a 128-bit key.
   Jeff Jacoby: confirmed Blake's assertion.
   Paul Hoffman: thinks we could just change the title of the example.
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Blake Ramsdell: tested OK.
   Jeff Jacoby: tested OK.
   Holger Ebel: tested OK.

6.4 Encrypted content, two recipients, no shared keying material
   John Pawling: tested OK but noted unsuccessful Invalid tag for
     privateKeyInfo for second login.
   Holger Ebel: tested OK.

6.5 Encrypted content, two recipients, shared keying material
   John Pawling: could not test due to bug in his code.
   Holger Ebel: tested OK.

6.6 Encrypted content, TripleDES and DH, previously-distributed keys
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Holger Ebel: tested OK.

6.7 Encrypted content, RC2/40 and RSA, previously-distributed keys
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Holger Ebel: tested OK.

6.8 S/MIME application/pkcs7-mime encrypted message
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Holger Ebel: tested OK.

6.9 EnvelopedData with All Recipient Types
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Holger Ebel: tested OK.

6.10 EnvelopedData with KARI RC2 Encryption
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Holger Ebel: tested OK.

6.11 EnvelopedData with KEK 3DES Encryption
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Holger Ebel: tested OK.

7. Digested-data
   Blake Ramsdell: tested OK.
   Jeff Jacoby: tested OK.

8. Encrypted-data

8.1 Simple EncryptedData
   Blake Ramsdell: tested OK.
   Jim Schaad: tested OK.
   Jeff Jacoby: tested OK.

8.2 EncryptedData with unprotected attributes
   Jim Schaad: failed badly.
     The key is not in the text and it is not the same as 8.1
	The encapsulated content type is EncryptedData not id-data
	The content hint content type does not match the encapsulated 
content type

9. Authenticated-data
   There are still no examples in this section.

10. Key Wrapping
   John Pawling: tested OK.

10.1 Wrapping RC2
   John Pawling: tested OK.

10.2 Wrapping TripleDES
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Holger Ebel: tested OK.

11. ESS Examples

11.1 ReceiptRequest
   John Pawling: test failed, has sent new example file.
   Jeff Jacoby: tested OK.

11.2 Receipt
   John Pawling: test failed, has sent new example file.

11.3 eSSSecurityLabel
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Jim Schaad: tested OK.
   Jeff Jacoby: tested OK.

11.4 EquivalentLabels
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Jeff Jacoby: tested OK.

11.5 mlExpansionHistory
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Jeff Jacoby: tested OK.

11.6 SigningCertificate
   John Pawling: tested OK.
   Jeff Jacoby: tested OK.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium

Prev by Date: Re: Status of the examples draft
Next by Date: RE: Status of the examples draft
Previous by thread: Re: Status of the examples draft
Next by thread: RE: Status of the examples draft
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread