RE: Draft-11Parital Results

["Jim Schaad" <jimsch@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Blake,

I completely agree that it was discussed.  (I think I raised the issue.)
And I agree that the content for the message is correct.  What needs to
be changed is the commentary not the message.

jim

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Blake Ramsdell [mailto:blake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:15 PM
> To: jimsch@xxxxxxxxxx; 'Ietf-Smime-Examples'; 
> ietf-smime@xxxxxxx; phoffman@xxxxxxx
> Cc: 'Sean P. Turner'; 'Russ Housley'
> Subject: RE: Draft-11Parital Results
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jim Schaad [mailto:jimsch@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 7:19 AM
> > To: Ietf-Smime-Examples; ietf-smime@xxxxxxx; phoffman@xxxxxxx
> > Cc: Sean P. Turner; Blake Ramsdell; Russ Housley
> > Subject: Draft-11Parital Results
> > 
> > 5.9  failed 
> > 	Commentary text states that the body part is the same 
> as 5.1 - this 
> > is not correct as the signature values and exContent are different
> > (content is actually "\0xd\0xaThis is some sample content."
> 
> This is something we discussed a bit ago -- the problem is 
> that ExContent.bin is not valid MIME data.  The compromise we 
> reached was that a CRLF would be inserted at the beginning, 
> which would make it valid MIME data (implicit text/plain).  
> When the MIME wrapping is removed, it results in ExContent.bin.
> 
> Blake
>