Re: draft-ietf-smime-idea

[Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman@xxxxxxx>]

> 3.  I would like this document to become a Standards Track document.

Not to disagree with the WG chair, but it is unclear why this should be on 
standards track. It is protocol information for the community about a 
non-mandatory algorithm that, as far as we can tell, is barely used. 
Because of that, isn't it much better qualified for Informational RFC?

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Internet Mail Consortium