=?utf-8?b?RVNTIDogU2VjdXJlIFJlY2VpcHQgZW5jb2Rpbmcgd2l0aGluIEVu?==?utf-8?b?Y2Fwc3VsYXRlZENvbnRlbnRJbmZv?=

[=?utf-8?b?Q2FtZXJvbiBTdGlsbGlvbg==?= <camerost@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

... and now for something completely different:
 
According to the ESS RFC on page 16, step 9:
 
9.  The ASN.1 DER encoded Receipt content MUST be directly encoded within
the signedData encapContentInfo eContent OCTET STRING defined in [CMS].
 
Should eContent be a DER-encoding of the receipt?
    or
Should eContent be a DER-encoding of an OCTET STRING containing the
DER-encoding of the receipt?
 
The word "directly" seems to indicate that the former is the correct one.
Just tell me I'm not crazy.
 
Cameron Stillion

<<application/ms-tnef>>