[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Comments on the RSAES-OAEP draft

To: "Ietf-Smime" <ietf-smime@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Comments on the RSAES-OAEP draft
From: "Jim Schaad" <jimsch@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 13:06:15 +0930
Cc: "Russ Housley" <housley@xxxxxxxxxx>
Importance: Normal
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smime/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-smime.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smime-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-ietf-smime@xxxxxxxxxxxx

1.  Given that the question has been raised on at least one IETF mailing
list, it might be advisable to state that the public key algorithm for rsa
in a certificate is the same for v1.5 and v2.0.

2.  You have consistantly gotten the RFC number for the v2.0 draft
incorrect.  It is 2437 not 2347.


jim

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Comments on the RSAES-OAEP draft
  - From: Russ Housley
- Re: Comments on the RSAES-OAEP draft
  - From: Russ Housley

Prev by Date: Comments on draft-ietf-smime-compression-00.txt
Next by Date: Compressed Data Content Type for S/MIME
Previous by thread: Comments on draft-ietf-smime-compression-00.txt
Next by thread: Re: Comments on the RSAES-OAEP draft
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread