|
This text sounds as it
implies a substantial expansion of scope of the capabilities issue. I don’t oppose this
change but suggest then that we change ”a specification will be developed“ to “specifications will be developed”. The type of complex approaches
recently discussed on this list to accommodate dynamic assertion of sMIMECapabilities
doesn’t mix very well with the simple and direct task to document the use
of the existing attribute structure as a certificate extension. I therefore strongly
suggest, in case the WG wants to pursue that path, that the recent discussed
expanded task is separated into its own work item and that the WG assigns
another editor for that work. I don’t have the
time and capacity to edit that specification. Stefan Santesson From: owner-ietf-smime@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-ietf-smime@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Sean P. Turner I'm going to forward the charter on to Russ with
Tony's suggested changes. As for the other issue of S/MIME
gateways, we'll see how it plays out in the other working group. All,
S/MIME Mail Security (smime)Chair: Sean Turner <turners@xxxxxxxx> Security Area Director: Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Steve Belovin <smb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Security Area Advisor: Russ Housley <housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx>Mailing Lists: General Discussion: ietf-smime@xxxxxxx To Subscribe: ietf-smime-request@xxxxxxx Archive: http://www.imc.org/ietf-smime/Description of Working Group:The S/MIME Working Group has completed a series of Proposed Standards that comprise the S/MIME version 3.1 specification. As part of the specification update, a new suite of "mandatory to implement" algorithms was be selected. Current efforts update and build upon these base specifications.The Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) (RFC 3852) is cryptographic algorithm independent, yet there is always more than one way to use any algorithm. To ensure interoperability, each algorithm should have a specification that describes its use with CMS. Specifications for the use of additional cryptographic algorithms will be developed.To aid implementers, documents containing example output for CMS will be collected and published. Some of the examples will include structures and signed attributes defined in the Enhanced SecurityServices (ESS) (RFC 2634) document.CMS, as well as S/MIME version 3 and later, permit the use of previously distributed symmetric key-encryption keys. Specifications for the distribution of symmetric key-encryption keys to multiple message recipients will be developed. Mail List Agents (MLAs) areone user of symmetric key-encryption keys. The specification will be algorithm independent.
Stike the following To aid initial determination of recipient's cryptographic capabilities a specification will be developed allowing S/MIME capabilities to be stored and asserted in X.509 certificates based on the X.509 certificate and CRL profile developed by the PKIX Working Group.
And replace it with: The working group will perform necessary interoperability testing to rogress the CMS and S/MIME specifications to Draft Standard. The CMS specification depends on the RFC 3280. This profile must progress to Draft Standard before CMS and the other S/MIME specifications can progress to Draft Standard. Assuming timely progress by the PKIX Working Group, the S/MIME specification can start progressing to Draft Standard in 2005.Milestones:History Submit CMS compressed data content type a Proposed Standard. Submit security label usage specification as Informational RFC. Submit elliptic curve algorithm specification as Informational RFC. Submit update to CMS as a Proposed Standard. Submit CMS Algorithms as a Proposed Standard. Submit AES key wrap algorithm description as Informational RFC. Last call on X.400 CMS wrapper specification. Last call on X.400 transport specification. Last call on HMAC key wrap description specification. Last call on RSA OAEP algorithm specification. Last call on AES algorithm specification. Last call on update to MSG. First draft of update to CERT. First draft of CMS and ESS examples document. First draft of S/MIME version 3.1 interoperability matrix. First draft of RSA PSS algorithm specification. Submit mail list key distribution as a Proposed Standard. Submit HMAC key wrap description as Proposed Standard. Submit RSA OAEP algorithm specification as a Proposed Standard. Sumbit AES algorithm specification as Proposed Standard. Submit X.400 CMS wrapper specification as a Proposed Standard. Submit X.400 transport as a Proposed Standard. Last call on CMS and ESS examples document. Sumbit update to CERT as Proposed Standard. Sumbit update to MSG as Proposed Standard. First draft of RSA KEM algorithm specification. Last call on RSA PSS algorithm specification. Submit RSA PSS algorithm specification as Proposed StandardSeptember 04 Submit CMS and ESS examples document as Informational RFC First draft of S/MIME Capabilities Certificate ExtensionOctober 04 Working Group Last Call for S/MIME Capabilities Certificate ExtensionDecember 04 Submit S/MIME Capabilities Certificate Extension as Informational RFCJanuary 05 Final S/MIME version 3.1 interoperability matrix February 05 Request advancement of CMS Algorithms to Draft Standard Request advancement of CMS to Draft Standard Request advancement of ESS to Draft Standard Request advancement of CERT to Draft Standard Request advancement of MSG to Draft Standard Last call on RSA KEM algorithm specificationJanuary 06 Submit RSA KEM algorithm specification as Proposed Standard |