RE: To Meet or Not

["Stefan Santesson" <stefans@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>From my perspective I think the S/MIME Capabilities draft should be ready for WG last call after next IETF. In the event that a meeting would be supportive of that process, I vote for having a meeting in Washington. 

Stefan Santesson 
Microsoft Security Center of Excellence (SCOE) 
  
________________________________________
From: owner-ietf-smime@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ietf-smime@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sean P. Turner
Sent: den 14 oktober 2004 15:25
To: SMIME
Subject: To Meet or Not

All,

At the last meeting in San Diego we determined that the list should decide whether we hold future meetings.  Here's the list of open issues for this meeting:
- Symkeydist - it's still going to be pinned by CMC
- PSS - it's still going to be pinned by PSS in PKIX
- KEM - it's still going to be pinned/waiting on ANSI
- Static S/MIME Capabilities (i.e., cert extension) - new draft?
- ESS Update - any news?
- GOST - any news?

So a couple of questions:
- Are there any other issues that ought to be addressed?
- Do we believe there is enough to warrant a meeting?

I'll be soliciting input on whether we should have a meeting until 20 October 2004.  Silence means no meeting.

spt