RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-smime-cms-auth-enveloped-03.txt

["Turner, Sean P." <turners@xxxxxxxx>]

This might require that an algorithm registration indicates which one they'd
use.  Unless of course, this is just an efficiency thing and it wouldn't
error out.

spt

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ietf-smime@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-ietf-smime@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter Gutmann
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 9:41 AM
> To: Peter.Sylvester@xxxxxxxxxx; pgut001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: housley@xxxxxxxxxxxx; ietf-smime@xxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-smime-cms-auth-enveloped-03.txt
> 
> 
> Peter Sylvester <Peter.Sylvester@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >I would like to repeat my suggestion to have two fields, one 
> before and 
> >one behind.
> 
> Sounds good to me.
> 
> Peter.
> 
>