[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[2]: A contradiction between RFC3852 and RFC3278

To: "Sean Turner" <turners@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re[2]: A contradiction between RFC3852 and RFC3278
From: "Maxim Masiutin" <max@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 18:24:54 +0200
Cc: ietf-pkix@xxxxxxx, ietf-smime@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <49BE79DC.6020201@xxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smime/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-smime.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smime-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <68226881330328496@xxxxxxxxxxx> <49BA8298.1010206@xxxxxxxx> <158373798653032637@xxxxxxxxxxx> <49BAF2A8.8040807@xxxxxxxx> <1653718522457018254@xxxxxxxxxxx> <49BE79DC.6020201@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: "Maxim Masiutin" <max@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-smime@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Hello Sean,

Thank you, your suggestion to add a paragraph is fine!

-- 
Best regards,
Maxim Masiutin                            mailto:max@xxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- Re: A contradiction between RFC3852 and RFC3278
  - From: Sean Turner
- Re[2]: A contradiction between RFC3852 and RFC3278
  - From: Maxim Masiutin

Prev by Date: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4134 (1716)
Previous by thread: Re[2]: A contradiction between RFC3852 and RFC3278
Next by thread: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4134 (1716)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread