Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-smime-3850bis-09.txt]

[Sean Turner <turners@xxxxxxxx>]

I did receive some comments on this draft at the last second:

- SHOULD- on 1024-bit DSA key ought to be SHOULD
- RSA-PSS should be replaced with RSASSA-PSS
- RSASA-PSS in references should be RSASSA-PSS

I think the 1st one is a good suggestion because SHOULD- on a key size 
doesn't seem to make much sense to me especially in the light of DSA 
with SHA-256 being a SHOULD+.

The last two are editorial.

Unless there's strong objections to adopting these changes, I'll post a 
new version of this ID Friday afternoon for Tim to continue processing.

spt

Sean Turner wrote:
> To date, I have received no comments on this version of the ID.
>
> spt
>
> Sean Turner wrote:
> > This ID incorporates comments necessary to resolve IESG DISCUSSES and 
> > incorporates key size text from our Area Director.  The changes were 
> > in some cases significant and as a result I'm asking for a one week 
> > comment period that will end 22 April 2009 @ 8am EST.
> >
> > spt