Archive of ietf-smtp, by date

Go to thread index
Go to main page for ietf-smtp

Page 12 of 15
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Hector Santos, 03/15/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, David MacQuigg, 03/15/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Bruce Lilly, 03/14/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Tony Finch, 03/14/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Bruce Lilly, 03/14/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Tony Finch, 03/14/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Bruce Lilly, 03/14/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, John C Klensin, 03/14/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Tony Finch, 03/14/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, John C Klensin, 03/14/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03/14/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Frank Ellermann, 03/13/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Bruce Lilly, 03/13/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Bruce Lilly, 03/13/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Tony Finch, 03/13/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03/13/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Tony Finch, 03/13/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Bruce Lilly, 03/13/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, John C Klensin, 03/13/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Tony Finch, 03/13/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Hector Santos, 03/12/2005
Re: Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, Robert A. Rosenberg, 03/12/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Bruce Lilly, 03/11/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, John C Klensin, 03/11/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball, Bruce Lilly, 03/11/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, John Leslie, 03/11/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Tony Finch, 03/11/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Bruce Lilly, 03/11/2005
Has the IETF dropped the ball, David MacQuigg, 03/11/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Tony Finch, 03/11/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Bruce Lilly, 03/11/2005
Re: Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, Hector Santos, 03/11/2005
Re: (lack of) message header field ordering, Tony Finch, 03/11/2005
Re: Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, Bruce Lilly, 03/11/2005
Re: Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, David MacQuigg, 03/11/2005
Re: Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, Russ Allbery, 03/10/2005
Re: Impossibility of Stopping Spam, Russ Allbery, 03/10/2005
Re: Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, Glenn Anderson, 03/10/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Frank Ellermann, 03/10/2005
Re: Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, David MacQuigg, 03/10/2005
Re: Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, Glenn Anderson, 03/10/2005
(lack of) message header field ordering, Bruce Lilly, 03/10/2005
Re: Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, Hector Santos, 03/10/2005
Re: New Authenticated: header?, Bruce Lilly, 03/10/2005
Re: one use for mail folders, Hector Santos, 03/10/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Tony Hansen, 03/10/2005
Re: Spam Bounces - was What is Spam, Bruce Lilly, 03/10/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Keith Moore, 03/10/2005
Re: Spam Bounces - was What is Spam, Carl S. Gutekunst, 03/10/2005
smtp mailing list activity, Dave Crocker, 03/10/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Hector Santos, 03/10/2005
Impossibility of Stopping Spam, David MacQuigg, 03/10/2005
Re: Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, Carl S. Gutekunst, 03/10/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, David MacQuigg, 03/10/2005
Re: Spam Bounces - was What is Spam, David MacQuigg, 03/10/2005
one use for mail folders, Keith Moore, 03/10/2005
Re: Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, Keith Moore, 03/10/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Keith Moore, 03/10/2005
Can reputable domains stop outgoing spam?, David MacQuigg, 03/10/2005
What is the impact of enforcing SMTP compliancy?, Hector Santos, 03/10/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Tony Finch, 03/10/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Bruce Lilly, 03/10/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Tony Finch, 03/10/2005
Re: New Authenticated: header?, David MacQuigg, 03/10/2005
Re: New Authenticated: header?, Tony Finch, 03/10/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Bruce Lilly, 03/10/2005
Re: Spam Bounces - was What is Spam, Bruce Lilly, 03/10/2005
Re: New Authenticated: header?, Bruce Lilly, 03/10/2005
Re: New Authenticated: header?, Bruce Lilly, 03/10/2005
Re: Do we need SMTP compliance?, Hector Santos, 03/10/2005
Re: Do we need SMTP compliance?, Keith Moore, 03/10/2005
Re: Do we need SMTP compliance?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03/10/2005
Re: Do we need SMTP compliance?, Keith Moore, 03/10/2005
Do we need SMTP compliance?, David MacQuigg, 03/10/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Keith Moore, 03/10/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Hector Santos, 03/10/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Hector Santos, 03/10/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, David MacQuigg, 03/10/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Frank Ellermann, 03/09/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Keith Moore, 03/09/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Frank Ellermann, 03/09/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, David MacQuigg, 03/09/2005
Spam Bounces - was What is Spam, David MacQuigg, 03/09/2005
Re: New Authenticated: header?, David MacQuigg, 03/09/2005
Re: New Authenticated: header?, Tony Finch, 03/09/2005
Re: New Authenticated: header?, Hector Santos, 03/09/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Hector Santos, 03/09/2005
New Authenticated: header?, John Leslie, 03/09/2005
what is spam?, Dave Crocker, 03/09/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Russ Allbery, 03/09/2005
Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, David MacQuigg, 03/09/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Keith Moore, 03/09/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Bruce Lilly, 03/09/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, David MacQuigg, 03/09/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, David MacQuigg, 03/09/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Hector Santos, 03/09/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Bruce Lilly, 03/09/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Hector Santos, 03/09/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Eric A. Hall, 03/09/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Hector Santos, 03/09/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Hector Santos, 03/09/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Tony Hansen, 03/09/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, David MacQuigg, 03/09/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Hector Santos, 03/09/2005
Re:, Hector Santos, 03/09/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03/09/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Hector Santos, 03/09/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Hector Santos, 03/09/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, David MacQuigg, 03/09/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Carl S. Gutekunst, 03/08/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, David MacQuigg, 03/08/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Bruce Lilly, 03/08/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Russ Allbery, 03/08/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Hector Santos, 03/08/2005
Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, Russ Allbery, 03/08/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Eric A. Hall, 03/08/2005
Re: Has the IETF dropped the ball?, Bruce Lilly, 03/08/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Hector Santos, 03/08/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Tony Finch, 03/08/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Bruce Lilly, 03/08/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Bruce Lilly, 03/08/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, John C Klensin, 03/08/2005
Has the IETF dropped the ball?, David MacQuigg, 03/08/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Hector Santos, 03/08/2005
Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, Bruce Lilly, 03/08/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, John C Klensin, 03/08/2005
Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, David MacQuigg, 03/07/2005
Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, Frank Ellermann, 03/07/2005
Re: Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, Bruce Lilly, 03/07/2005
Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, Bruce Lilly, 03/07/2005
Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, David MacQuigg, 03/07/2005
Re: Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, Hector Santos, 03/07/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Keith Moore, 03/07/2005
Re: Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, willemien, 03/07/2005
Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, David MacQuigg, 03/07/2005
Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, Dave Crocker, 03/06/2005
Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, Bruce Lilly, 03/06/2005
Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, David MacQuigg, 03/05/2005
Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, Frank Ellermann, 03/05/2005
Re: Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, David MacQuigg, 03/05/2005
Re: Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03 Users, MDA and administrative domains, willemien, 03/05/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, John C Klensin, 03/04/2005
Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03, Frank Ellermann, 03/04/2005
Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03, Bruce Lilly, 03/03/2005
Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03, Bruce Lilly, 03/03/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Keith Moore, 03/02/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Hector Santos, 03/02/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Vince Sabio, 03/02/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, EdLevinson, 03/02/2005
Site policy vs. HELO, Vince Sabio, 03/02/2005
Re: Site policy vs. HELO, Bruce Lilly, 02/28/2005
Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03, Willemien, 02/25/2005
Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03, Mark E. Mallett, 02/23/2005
Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03, Dave Crocker, 02/19/2005
Re: draft-crocker-email-arch-03, Willemien, 02/19/2005
draft-crocker-email-arch-03, Dave Crocker, 02/17/2005
Re: [Another long] commnets on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Frank Ellermann, 02/09/2005
Re: [Another long] commnets on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Dave Crocker, 02/07/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, wayne, 02/02/2005
Re: Pipelining vs. multiple failure codes, ned+ietf-smtp, 02/02/2005
Re: Pipelining vs. multiple failure codes, Hector Santos, 02/02/2005
RE: Pipelining vs. multiple failure codes, Jeff Stephenson, 02/02/2005
Re: Pipelining vs. multiple failure codes, Matti Aarnio, 02/02/2005
Re: Pipelining vs. multiple failure codes, Tony Finch, 02/02/2005
Re: Pipelining vs. multiple failure codes, Richard Dawe, 02/02/2005
Re: Pipelining vs. multiple failure codes, Tony Finch, 02/02/2005
Pipelining vs. multiple failure codes, Richard Dawe, 02/02/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Dave Crocker, 02/01/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-malamud-subject-line-00.txt (fwd), Carl Malamud, 02/01/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-malamud-subject-line-00.txt (fwd), Bruce Lilly, 02/01/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Bruce Lilly, 01/31/2005
I-D ACTION:draft-malamud-subject-line-00.txt (fwd), Carl Malamud, 01/31/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Frank Ellermann, 01/29/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-malamud-keyword-discovery-00.txt (fwd), Bruce Lilly, 01/29/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Bruce Lilly, 01/29/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Bruce Lilly, 01/29/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Bruce Lilly, 01/29/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Dave Crocker, 01/29/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Bruce Lilly, 01/29/2005
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-malamud-keyword-discovery-00.txt (fwd), Arnt Gulbrandsen, 01/29/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Bruce Lilly, 01/29/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Bruce Lilly, 01/29/2005
I-D ACTION:draft-malamud-keyword-discovery-00.txt (fwd), Carl Malamud, 01/29/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Bruce Lilly, 01/29/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Bruce Lilly, 01/29/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Bruce Lilly, 01/29/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Bruce Lilly, 01/29/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Frank Ellermann, 01/29/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Hector Santos, 01/28/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Dave Crocker, 01/28/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Mark E. Mallett, 01/28/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Frank Ellermann, 01/27/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Dave Crocker, 01/27/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Tony Finch, 01/27/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, ned+ietf-smtp, 01/27/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Frank Ellermann, 01/27/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Tony Finch, 01/27/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Frank Ellermann, 01/27/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Tony Finch, 01/27/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Frank Ellermann, 01/27/2005
Re: revised Email Architecture draft, Hector Santos, 01/26/2005
revised Email Architecture draft, Dave Crocker, 01/26/2005
Re: comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Tony Finch, 01/10/2005
Re: comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Tony Finch, 01/10/2005
Re: comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Dave Crocker, 01/10/2005
Re: comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, D. J. Bernstein, 01/09/2005
Re: comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Tony Finch, 01/09/2005
Re: comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Bruce Lilly, 01/09/2005
MTAs with trouble delivering to MX -> CNAME, Richard Dawe, 01/06/2005
Re: comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Tony Finch, 01/06/2005
Re: comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Bruce Lilly, 01/06/2005
SPF I-D for review: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-00.txt, wayne, 01/03/2005
Re: comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Tony Finch, 12/30/2004
Re: comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Hector Santos, 12/25/2004
Re: comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Bruce Lilly, 12/23/2004
Re: comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Hector Santos, 12/23/2004
Re: comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, John Leslie, 12/23/2004
Re: comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Tony Finch, 12/23/2004
Re: comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Bruce Lilly, 12/22/2004
Re: [long] commnets on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Tony Finch, 12/22/2004
Re: [long] commnets on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Dave Crocker, 12/22/2004
[Another long] commnets on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Willemien, 12/22/2004
[Another long] commnets on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Willemien, 12/22/2004
Re: [long] commnets on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Tony Finch, 12/22/2004
Re: [long] commnets on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Dave Crocker, 12/21/2004
Re: [long] commnets on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Bruce Lilly, 12/21/2004
Re: [long] commnets on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Dave Crocker, 12/21/2004
Re: comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Bruce Lilly, 12/21/2004
Re: [long] commnets on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Tony Finch, 12/21/2004
Re: [long] commnets on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Dave Crocker, 12/21/2004
Re: The concepts of email address and mailbox, Bruce Lilly, 12/21/2004
Re: [long] commnets on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Tony Finch, 12/21/2004
Re: The concepts of email address and mailbox, Tony Finch, 12/21/2004
Re: [long] commnets on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Dave Crocker, 12/21/2004
Re: [long] commnets on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Dave Crocker, 12/20/2004
Re: [long] commnets on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Dave Crocker, 12/20/2004
Re: [long] commnets on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Bruce Lilly, 12/20/2004
The concepts of email address and mailbox, Jochen Topf, 12/19/2004
Re: [long] commnets on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Dave Crocker, 12/18/2004
Re: standards spring cleaning, Bruce Lilly, 12/07/2004
Re: standards spring cleaning, Nathaniel Borenstein, 12/07/2004
Re: Fwd: standards spring cleaning, Bruce Lilly, 12/06/2004
Fwd: standards spring cleaning, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 12/06/2004
Re: RFC2821 and EHLO-specified extensions., Valdis . Kletnieks, 11/19/2004
Re: SASL vs. IP relay authorization, Tony Finch, 11/19/2004
Re: SASL vs. IP relay authorization, Valdis . Kletnieks, 11/19/2004
SASL vs. IP relay authorization, Tony Finch, 11/19/2004
Re: RFC2821 and EHLO-specified extensions., Keith Moore, 11/18/2004
Re: RFC2821 and EHLO-specified extensions., Bruce Lilly, 11/18/2004
Re: RFC2821 and EHLO-specified extensions., Bruce Lilly, 11/18/2004
Re: RFC2821 and EHLO-specified extensions., Valdis . Kletnieks, 11/18/2004
Re: RFC2821 and EHLO-specified extensions., Keith Moore, 11/18/2004
Re: RFC2821 and EHLO-specified extensions., Valdis . Kletnieks, 11/18/2004
Re: RFC2821 and EHLO-specified extensions., Bruce Lilly, 11/18/2004
Re: RFC2821 and EHLO-specified extensions., Valdis . Kletnieks, 11/18/2004
Re: RFC2821 and EHLO-specified extensions., Tony Hansen, 11/17/2004
RE: RFC2821 and EHLO-specified extensions., Daryl Odnert, 11/17/2004
Re: RFC2821 and EHLO-specified extensions., Bruce Lilly, 11/17/2004
RFC2821 and EHLO-specified extensions., Valdis . Kletnieks, 11/17/2004
Fw: [spf-discuss] New Sender-ID draft, Hector Santos, 10/26/2004
Fwd: WG Review: Recharter of Open Pluggable Edge Services (opes), Pete Resnick, 10/25/2004
[long] commnets on draft-crocker-email-arch-01, Tony Finch, 09/10/2004
Initial comments on draft-croker-email-arch, Bruce Lilly, 09/09/2004
Re: 3rd party ietf-compliance testers, Hector Santos, 09/06/2004
3rd party ietf-compliance testers, Tony Hansen, 09/01/2004
Extensions for Reliable Submission of Requests That Take a Long T ime, Eric Burger, 08/31/2004
Re: SMTP delivery strategies, SM, 08/28/2004
Re: SMTP delivery strategies, Keith Moore, 08/27/2004
SMTP delivery strategies, Markus Stumpf, 08/27/2004
Re: Buglet in RFC3461 - DSN, section 4.2., Valdis . Kletnieks, 08/10/2004
Buglet in RFC3461 - DSN, section 4.2., Valdis . Kletnieks, 08/10/2004
Re: comments on draft-shveidel-mediasize-05 (in Last Call for PS), Nathaniel Borenstein, 07/28/2004
comments on draft-shveidel-mediasize-05 (in Last Call for PS), Keith Moore, 07/28/2004
Fw: Last Call: 'SMTP Service Extension for message Media Size declaration' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 07/27/2004
Re: DELIVER AFTER extension, Madan Ganesh Velayudham, 07/16/2004
Re: DELIVER AFTER extension, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 07/16/2004
DELIVER AFTER extension, Madan Ganesh Velayudham, 07/16/2004
Re: Virus scanning non-structured emails, Valdis . Kletnieks, 07/09/2004
Re: Virus scanning non-structured emails, Keith Moore, 07/09/2004
Re: Virus scanning non-structured emails, SM, 07/09/2004
Re: Virus scanning non-structured emails, Keith Moore, 07/09/2004
Re: Virus scanning non-structured emails, SM, 07/09/2004
Re: Virus scanning non-structured emails, Keith Moore, 07/09/2004
Re: Virus scanning non-structured emails, Valdis . Kletnieks, 07/09/2004
Re: Virus scanning non-structured emails, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 07/09/2004
Re: Virus scanning non-structured emails, Paul Smith, 07/09/2004
Re: Virus scanning non-structured emails, Keith Moore, 07/09/2004
Re: Virus scanning non-structured emails, Paul Smith, 07/09/2004
Re: Virus scanning non-structured emails, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 07/09/2004
Re: Virus scanning non-structured emails, John C Klensin, 07/09/2004
Re: Virus scanning non-structured emails, Paul Smith, 07/09/2004
Re: Virus scanning non-structured emails, Valdis . Kletnieks, 07/09/2004
Virus scanning non-structured emails, Paul Smith, 07/09/2004
Re: Revised draft-crocker-mail-arch, Hector Santos, 07/06/2004
Revised draft-crocker-mail-arch, Dave Crocker, 07/04/2004
Re: Fw: http://brandenburg.com/specifications/draft-crocker-mail-arch-00.htm, Dave Crocker, 06/25/2004
Re: more comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-00, Dave Crocker, 06/20/2004
yet more comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-00, Tony Finch, 06/20/2004
Re: more comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-00, Tony Finch, 06/18/2004
Re: more comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-00, Dave Crocker, 06/17/2004
Re: more comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-00, Tony Finch, 06/17/2004
Re: more comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-00, Tony Finch, 06/17/2004
Re: more comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-00, Kai Henningsen, 06/17/2004
Re: more comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-00, Dave Crocker, 06/16/2004
more comments on draft-crocker-email-arch-00, Tony Finch, 06/15/2004
Re: Blind acceptance - draft-hutzler-spamops-00.txt, Hector Santos, 06/15/2004
Blind acceptance - draft-hutzler-spamops-00.txt, Matthew Elvey, 06/14/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap, Keith Moore, 06/14/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap, Valdis . Kletnieks, 06/11/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap (alternate response), Dave Crocker, 06/11/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap (alternate response), Tony Finch, 06/11/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap (alternate response), Dave Crocker, 06/11/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap, Tony Finch, 06/10/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap, Tony Finch, 06/10/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap (alternate response), Tony Finch, 06/10/2004
Re: comments on draft-zinn-smtp-bounces-01.txt, Valdis . Kletnieks, 06/09/2004
comments on draft-zinn-smtp-bounces-01.txt, Markus Stumpf, 06/08/2004
Fw: Last Call: 'SMTP and MIME Extensions For Content Conversion' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 06/08/2004
Re: Getmail: A New Email Delivery Architecture to Control Spam, Valdis . Kletnieks, 06/02/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap, Dave Crocker, 06/01/2004
Re: Getmail: A New Email Delivery Architecture to Control Spam, John C Klensin, 06/01/2004
Re: Internet Mail Architecture draft -- consensus or competition?, Richard O. Hammer, 06/01/2004
Getmail: A New Email Delivery Architecture to Control Spam, Zhenhai Duan, 06/01/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap, John C Klensin, 06/01/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap, Eric A. Hall, 05/31/2004
Re: Internet Mail Architecture draft, Valdis . Kletnieks, 05/31/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap, Cyrus Daboo, 05/31/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap, ned+ietf-smtp, 05/31/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap, Dave Crocker, 05/31/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap (alternate response), Dave Crocker, 05/31/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap (alternate response), Hector Santos, 05/30/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap (alternate response), Pete Resnick, 05/30/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap, Eric A. Hall, 05/30/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap (alternate response), Cyrus Daboo, 05/30/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap (alternate response), Pete Resnick, 05/30/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap, ned+ietf-smtp, 05/30/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap (alternate response), Dave Crocker, 05/30/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap, Pete Resnick, 05/30/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap, Dave Crocker, 05/30/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap, ned+ietf-smtp, 05/30/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap, Hector Santos, 05/30/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap, Cyrus Daboo, 05/29/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap, Pete Resnick, 05/29/2004
Re: Internet Mail Architecture draft, Eric A. Hall, 05/29/2004
Re: Internet Mail Architecture draft, Dave Crocker, 05/29/2004
Re: MS vs. pop and imap, Eric A. Hall, 05/29/2004
Re: Internet Mail Architecture draft, Eric A. Hall, 05/29/2004
MS vs. pop and imap, Dave Crocker, 05/29/2004
Re: Internet Mail Architecture draft, Cyrus Daboo, 05/29/2004
Re: Internet Mail Architecture draft, Dave Crocker, 05/29/2004
Re: Internet Mail Architecture draft, Dave Crocker, 05/29/2004
Re: Internet Mail Architecture draft, Eric A. Hall, 05/18/2004
Re: Internet Mail Architecture draft, Chris Newman, 05/17/2004
Re: Internet Mail Architecture draft, Dave Crocker, 05/17/2004
Fw: http://brandenburg.com/specifications/draft-crocker-mail-arch-00.htm, Ed Bradford, 05/17/2004
Re: Internet Mail Architecture draft, Paul Overell, 05/17/2004
Internet Mail Architecture draft, Dave Crocker, 05/15/2004
Re: SMTP/TLS: Authentication of an SMTP server's identity, Russ Allbery, 05/09/2004
Re: SMTP/TLS: Authentication of an SMTP server's identity, Keith Moore, 05/09/2004
Re: SMTP/TLS: Authentication of an SMTP server's identity, Russ Allbery, 05/07/2004
Re: SMTP/TLS: Authentication of an SMTP server's identity, Markus Stumpf, 05/07/2004
Re: SMTP/TLS: Authentication of an SMTP server's identity, Russ Allbery, 05/07/2004
Re: SMTP/TLS: Authentication of an SMTP server's identity, John C Klensin, 05/07/2004
Re: SMTP/TLS: Authentication of an SMTP server's identity, Russ Allbery, 05/07/2004
Re: SMTP/TLS: Authentication of an SMTP server's identity, Russ Allbery, 05/07/2004
Re: SMTP/TLS: Authentication of an SMTP server's identity, Markus Stumpf, 05/07/2004
Re: SMTP/TLS: Authentication of an SMTP server's identity, Keith Moore, 05/07/2004
Re: SMTP/TLS: Authentication of an SMTP server's identity, Russ Allbery, 05/06/2004
Re: SMTP/TLS: Authentication of an SMTP server's identity, Keith Moore, 05/06/2004
SMTP/TLS: Authentication of an SMTP server's identity, Daryl Odnert, 05/06/2004
[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hall-inline-dsn-01.txt], Eric A. Hall, 05/03/2004
Re: 5xx errors in general and MXs, Keith Moore, 04/23/2004
5xx errors in general and MXs, Markus Stumpf, 04/22/2004
Re: collected comments on "When NOT to Bounce Email", John C Klensin, 04/22/2004
collected comments on "When NOT to Bounce Email", bz, 04/19/2004
seeking discussion on network protocols and property rights, Richard O. Hammer, 04/19/2004
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-01.txt, ned+ietf-smtp, 04/17/2004
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-01.txt, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 04/13/2004
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-01.txt, Keith Moore, 04/12/2004
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-01.txt, Valdis . Kletnieks, 04/12/2004
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-01.txt, D. J. Bernstein, 04/12/2004
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-01.txt, Valdis . Kletnieks, 04/12/2004
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-01.txt, Keith Moore, 04/12/2004
Re: value of deferred RCPT responses?, Keith Moore, 04/12/2004
Re: value of deferred RCPT responses?, Kai Henningsen, 04/12/2004
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-01.txt, Valdis . Kletnieks, 04/12/2004
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-01.txt, Keith Moore, 04/12/2004
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-01.txt, ned+ietf-smtp, 04/12/2004
Re: I-D announcement: When NOT to Bounce Email, Valdis . Kletnieks, 04/12/2004
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-01.txt, Keith Moore, 04/12/2004
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-01.txt, Arun Sankar, 04/12/2004
Re: I-D announcement: When NOT to Bounce Email, bz, 04/09/2004
RE: I-D announcement: When NOT to Bounce Email, Daryl Odnert, 04/08/2004
Re: I-D announcement: When NOT to Bounce Email, Keith Moore, 04/08/2004
I-D announcement: When NOT to Bounce Email, bz, 04/08/2004
[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hall-inline-dsn-00.txt], Eric A. Hall, 04/05/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Hector Santos, 04/04/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, John C Klensin, 04/03/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Eric A. Hall, 04/03/2004
Re: value of deferred RCPT responses?, John C Klensin, 04/03/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, John C Klensin, 04/03/2004
Re: value of deferred RCPT responses?, Eric A. Hall, 04/03/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Eric A. Hall, 04/03/2004
value of deferred RCPT responses?, Keith Moore, 04/03/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, John C Klensin, 04/03/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Eric A. Hall, 04/01/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, John C Klensin, 04/01/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Valdis . Kletnieks, 04/01/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Tony Hansen, 04/01/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Eric A. Hall, 04/01/2004
Re: 551: Do MTAs try forward-path???, Valdis . Kletnieks, 03/31/2004
Re: 551: Do MTAs try forward-path???, James M Galvin, 03/31/2004
551: Do MTAs try forward-path???, Martin R. Garcia, 03/31/2004
I-D ACTION:draft-arun-ncc-smtp-01.txt, Arun Sankar, 03/31/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Eric A. Hall, 03/28/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Claus Assmann, 03/28/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Eric A. Hall, 03/28/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Claus Assmann, 03/28/2004
MARID participation, Dave Crocker, 03/28/2004
RE: deferred RCPT responses, Vaudreuil, Greg M (Greg), 03/28/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, ned+ietf-smtp, 03/28/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Claus F�rber, 03/28/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03/28/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Eric A. Hall, 03/28/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Claus Assmann, 03/27/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Hector Santos, 03/27/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Eric A. Hall, 03/27/2004
Re: deferred RCPT responses, Hector Santos, 03/27/2004
deferred RCPT responses, Eric A. Hall, 03/27/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected, Hector Santos, 03/26/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected, Hector Santos, 03/26/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03/26/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected, Valdis . Kletnieks, 03/26/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infec ted messages?, James M Galvin, 03/26/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, Keld J�rn Simonsen, 03/26/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infec ted messages?, John C Klensin, 03/26/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03/26/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infec ted messages?, Hector Santos, 03/26/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected, bz, 03/26/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03/26/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, bz, 03/26/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infec ted messages?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03/26/2004
RE: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infec ted messages?, Daryl Odnert, 03/25/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infec ted messages?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 03/25/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infec ted messages?, Hector Santos, 03/25/2004
RE: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infec ted messages?, Daryl Odnert, 03/25/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infec ted messages?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 03/25/2004
RE: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infec ted messages?, Daryl Odnert, 03/25/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, Keld J�rn Simonsen, 03/25/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 03/25/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus., bz, 03/25/2004
Fw: Re: SPEWS: S1861 removal request, bz, 03/25/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, wayne, 03/24/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus., Valdis . Kletnieks, 03/24/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03/24/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, Keith Moore, 03/23/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, kent crispin, 03/23/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, John C Klensin, 03/23/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, Keith Moore, 03/23/2004
RE: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus., Daryl Odnert, 03/23/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus., bz, 03/23/2004
argh. wrong subject. Should have been Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus., bz, 03/23/2004
RE: Re: SPEWS: S1753 (The Motley Fool), Daryl Odnert, 03/23/2004
Fw: Re: SPEWS: S1753 (The Motley Fool), bz, 03/23/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, John C Klensin, 03/23/2004
RE: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infec ted messages?, Daryl Odnert, 03/23/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, Keith Moore, 03/23/2004
RE: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, Dan Wing, 03/23/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, John C Klensin, 03/23/2004
Re: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 03/23/2004
RE: Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, Dan Wing, 03/23/2004
Do the must 'bounce' rules need to be relaxed for virus infected messages?, bz, 03/23/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore, 03/19/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03/19/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore, 03/17/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Eric A. Hall, 03/17/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Lyndon Nerenberg, 03/17/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Eric A. Hall, 03/17/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Lyndon Nerenberg, 03/17/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Pete Resnick, 03/17/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Lyndon Nerenberg, 03/17/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, John C Klensin, 03/17/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Pete Resnick, 03/17/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, John C Klensin, 03/17/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03/17/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore, 03/16/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Eric A. Hall, 03/16/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore, 03/16/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore, 03/16/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Eric A. Hall, 03/16/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Eric A. Hall, 03/16/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore, 03/16/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Eric A. Hall, 03/16/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore, 03/16/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Eric A. Hall, 03/16/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore, 03/16/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore, 03/16/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Eric A. Hall, 03/16/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Eric A. Hall, 03/16/2004
Re: Submission and SMTP SRV records, Keith Moore, 03/16/2004

Page 12 of 15
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.