Archive of ietf-smtp, by date

Go to thread index
Go to main page for ietf-smtp

Page 1 of 15
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

Re: Proprietary or non-standard SMTP AUTH mechanisms, Hector Santos, 01/12/2012
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Carl S. Gutekunst, 01/12/2012
RE: Proprietary or non-standard SMTP AUTH mechanisms, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01/12/2012
RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01/12/2012
RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01/12/2012
Re: Proprietary or non-standard SMTP AUTH mechanisms, Hector Santos, 01/12/2012
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Carl S. Gutekunst, 01/12/2012
RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Robert A. Rosenberg, 01/12/2012
Re: Proprietary or non-standard SMTP AUTH mechanisms, Alexey Melnikov, 01/12/2012
Re: Proprietary or non-standard SMTP AUTH mechanisms, John C Klensin, 01/12/2012
Re: Proprietary or non-standard SMTP AUTH mechanisms, Alexey Melnikov, 01/12/2012
RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01/11/2012
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Robert A. Rosenberg, 01/11/2012
Proprietary or non-standard SMTP AUTH mechanisms, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01/11/2012
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Hector Santos, 01/11/2012
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Tony Finch, 01/11/2012
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Tony Finch, 01/11/2012
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 01/10/2012
RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01/10/2012
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, John Levine, 01/10/2012
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Dave CROCKER, 01/10/2012
RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01/10/2012
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Dave CROCKER, 01/10/2012
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Hector Santos, 01/10/2012
RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01/10/2012
RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01/10/2012
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Dave CROCKER, 01/10/2012
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, John Levine, 01/10/2012
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Dave CROCKER, 01/10/2012
RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01/09/2012
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, John Levine, 01/09/2012
RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01/09/2012
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, John Levine, 01/09/2012
RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01/09/2012
Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Douglas Otis, 12/28/2011
Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Douglas Otis, 12/28/2011
Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Dave CROCKER, 12/21/2011
Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Rich Kulawiec, 12/21/2011
Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Douglas Otis, 12/07/2011
FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-greylisting-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12/07/2011
Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Hector Santos, 12/05/2011
Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Alessandro Vesely, 12/04/2011
Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Tony Finch, 12/02/2011
Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Rolf E. Sonneveld, 12/01/2011
Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., John Levine, 12/01/2011
Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Paul Smith, 12/01/2011
Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Frank Ellermann, 12/01/2011
Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Arnt Gulbrandsen, 12/01/2011
Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Hector Santos, 11/30/2011
RE: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Murray S. Kucherawy, 11/30/2011
Re: Mail, not to be confused with spam..., SM, 11/30/2011
Mail, not to be confused with spam..., Alessandro Vesely, 11/30/2011
RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11/20/2011
Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Alexey Melnikov, 11/20/2011
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Bill McQuillan, 11/20/2011
Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Alexey Melnikov, 11/20/2011
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Hector, 11/20/2011
RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11/19/2011
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Bill McQuillan, 11/19/2011
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Tony Finch, 11/19/2011
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Dave CROCKER, 11/19/2011
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Dave CROCKER, 11/19/2011
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Bill McQuillan, 11/19/2011
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Dave CROCKER, 11/18/2011
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Hector Santos, 11/18/2011
RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11/17/2011
RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11/17/2011
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Tony Finch, 11/16/2011
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Bill McQuillan, 11/16/2011
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Hector Santos, 11/16/2011
Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Hector Santos, 11/16/2011
FW: I-D Action: draft-kucherawy-received-state-00.txt, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11/15/2011
Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Carl S. Gutekunst, 11/15/2011
Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Robert A. Rosenberg, 11/15/2011
Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Tony Finch, 11/15/2011
Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Tony Finch, 11/15/2011
SMTP TLS and CN Domain Matching, Hector Santos, 11/14/2011
RE: [apps-discuss] Feedback on draft-moonesamy-smtp-ipv6-00, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11/14/2011
Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Carl S. Gutekunst, 11/14/2011
Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Hector Santos, 11/14/2011
Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Alexey Melnikov, 11/14/2011
Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Alexey Melnikov, 11/14/2011
Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Carl S. Gutekunst, 11/14/2011
Re: [apps-discuss] Feedback on draft-moonesamy-smtp-ipv6-00, Frank Ellermann, 11/14/2011
Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Mark Andrews, 11/14/2011
Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Carl S. Gutekunst, 11/14/2011
Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Carl S. Gutekunst, 11/14/2011
Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Dave CROCKER, 11/14/2011
Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Carl S. Gutekunst, 11/14/2011
Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, SM, 11/14/2011
Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Tony Finch, 11/14/2011
Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Dave CROCKER, 11/14/2011
Re: Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 11/14/2011
Any interest in rigorous definition for SSL certificate verification in SMTP?, Carl S. Gutekunst, 11/14/2011
Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Jeff Macdonald, 11/07/2011
Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, Robert A. Rosenberg, 11/05/2011
Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, Hector Santos, 11/05/2011
Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, Robert A. Rosenberg, 11/04/2011
Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Douglas Otis, 11/04/2011
Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Douglas Otis, 11/04/2011
Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Hector Santos, 11/04/2011
Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Douglas Otis, 11/03/2011
Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Russ Allbery, 11/03/2011
Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Hector Santos, 11/03/2011
Re: SMTP and Kerberos, Douglas Otis, 11/03/2011
Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, Russ Allbery, 11/03/2011
Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, Keith Moore, 11/03/2011
Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, ned+ietf-smtp, 11/03/2011
Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, Russ Allbery, 11/03/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Alessandro Vesely, 11/03/2011
Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, Paul Smith, 11/03/2011
SMTP and Kerberos (was: Re: smtp-traffic-control), John C Klensin, 11/02/2011
Re: SMTP Kerberos Considerations, Russ Allbery, 11/02/2011
SMTP Kerberos Considerations, Hector Santos, 11/02/2011
Re: SMTP Kerberos support, Douglas Otis, 11/02/2011
Re: smtp-traffic-control, Russ Allbery, 11/02/2011
SMTP Kerberos support, Hector Santos, 11/02/2011
Re: smtp-traffic-control, Keith Moore, 11/02/2011
Re: smtp-traffic-control, Douglas Otis, 11/02/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, John C Klensin, 11/02/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Douglas Otis, 11/02/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, John C Klensin, 11/02/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Tim Kehres, 11/02/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, John Levine, 11/01/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Steve Atkins, 11/01/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Steve Atkins, 11/01/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Douglas Otis, 11/01/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, John C Klensin, 11/01/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Tony Finch, 11/01/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Steve Atkins, 10/31/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Mark Andrews, 10/31/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Douglas Otis, 10/31/2011
RE: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/31/2011
Re: retrying very often (was: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control), Claus Assmann, 10/31/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Steve Atkins, 10/31/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Tony Finch, 10/31/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Steve Atkins, 10/31/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Tony Finch, 10/31/2011
Re: Putting it all together, Hector Santos, 10/30/2011
Re: Per-session SMTP extensions, Hector Santos, 10/30/2011
Re: Per-session SMTP extensions (was: Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol), Peter J. Holzer, 10/30/2011
Re: Per-session SMTP extensions (was: Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol), Robert A. Rosenberg, 10/30/2011
Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Robert A. Rosenberg, 10/30/2011
Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, John C Klensin, 10/30/2011
Re: Per-session SMTP extensions (was: Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol), John C Klensin, 10/30/2011
Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, John C Klensin, 10/30/2011
Re: Putting it all together, Frank Ellermann, 10/30/2011
Re: Per-session SMTP extensions (was: Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol), Peter J. Holzer, 10/30/2011
Re: Putting it all together, Hector Santos, 10/30/2011
Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos, 10/30/2011
Re: Putting it all together, Paul Smith, 10/30/2011
Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Paul Smith, 10/30/2011
Putting it all together, Hector Santos, 10/29/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Hector Santos, 10/29/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Robert A. Rosenberg, 10/29/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Robert A. Rosenberg, 10/29/2011
Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Hector Santos, 10/29/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, John C Klensin, 10/29/2011
Re: Per-session SMTP extensions, Carl S. Gutekunst, 10/29/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Russ Allbery, 10/29/2011
Per-session SMTP extensions (was: Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol), John C Klensin, 10/29/2011
Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Carl S. Gutekunst, 10/29/2011
Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Carl S. Gutekunst, 10/29/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Paul Smith, 10/29/2011
Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos, 10/29/2011
Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, John C Klensin, 10/29/2011
Proposal: SMTP Ext - Base protocol for structured responses, Hector Santos, 10/29/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Steve Atkins, 10/29/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, John C Klensin, 10/29/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Peter J. Holzer, 10/29/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Peter J. Holzer, 10/29/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Peter J. Holzer, 10/29/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Peter J. Holzer, 10/29/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Peter J. Holzer, 10/29/2011
Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Peter J. Holzer, 10/29/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Rosenwald, Jordan, 10/29/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Hector Santos, 10/29/2011
Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Peter J. Holzer, 10/29/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Dave CROCKER, 10/29/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 10/29/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Peter J. Holzer, 10/29/2011
RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/29/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, SM, 10/29/2011
RE: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/29/2011
Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Paul Smith, 10/29/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Paul Smith, 10/29/2011
RE: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, SM, 10/29/2011
Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos, 10/29/2011
Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Hector Santos, 10/29/2011
Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Hector Santos, 10/29/2011
Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Peter J. Holzer, 10/29/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Peter J. Holzer, 10/29/2011
Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Peter J. Holzer, 10/29/2011
RE: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/28/2011
Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Carl S. Gutekunst, 10/28/2011
RE: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/28/2011
RE: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/28/2011
RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/28/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector Santos, 10/28/2011
Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Carl S. Gutekunst, 10/28/2011
Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Hector Santos, 10/28/2011
Re: Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Steve Atkins, 10/28/2011
Server Enforcement of Time Blocks (wait=), Hector Santos, 10/28/2011
Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos, 10/28/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst, 10/28/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Steve Atkins, 10/28/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector Santos, 10/28/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst, 10/28/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector Santos, 10/28/2011
Re: draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Hector Santos, 10/28/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Douglas Otis, 10/28/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Tim Kehres, 10/28/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Robert A. Rosenberg, 10/28/2011
draft-atkins-smtp-traffic-control, Steve Atkins, 10/28/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Steve Atkins, 10/28/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Claus Assmann, 10/28/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst, 10/28/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Peter J. Holzer, 10/28/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Steve Atkins, 10/28/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Rosenwald, Jordan, 10/28/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Peter J. Holzer, 10/28/2011
Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, John C Klensin, 10/28/2011
Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Hector Santos, 10/28/2011
Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Tony Finch, 10/28/2011
Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Hector Santos, 10/28/2011
Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Tony Finch, 10/28/2011
Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos, 10/27/2011
Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos, 10/27/2011
Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Robert A. Rosenberg, 10/27/2011
Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Pete Resnick, 10/27/2011
Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Dave CROCKER, 10/27/2011
Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Pete Resnick, 10/27/2011
Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, SM, 10/27/2011
Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos, 10/27/2011
Re: 4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, John C Klensin, 10/27/2011
4yz Temporary Rejections is part of the SMTP Protocol, Hector Santos, 10/27/2011
Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Dave CROCKER, 10/27/2011
Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Hector Santos, 10/27/2011
Re: Trusted agency (was: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING), Richard Kulawiec, 10/27/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Richard Kulawiec, 10/27/2011
Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Dave CROCKER, 10/26/2011
RE: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/26/2011
RE: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/26/2011
RE: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/26/2011
Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Hector, 10/26/2011
Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Hector, 10/26/2011
Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Hector, 10/26/2011
Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Keith Moore, 10/26/2011
Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Pete Resnick, 10/26/2011
Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Paul Smith, 10/26/2011
Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Keith Moore, 10/26/2011
Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, John C Klensin, 10/26/2011
Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Steve Atkins, 10/26/2011
Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Dave CROCKER, 10/26/2011
Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Tim Kehres, 10/26/2011
Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Dave CROCKER, 10/26/2011
Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Tim Kehres, 10/26/2011
Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Pete Resnick, 10/26/2011
Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, John C Klensin, 10/26/2011
Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Dave CROCKER, 10/26/2011
Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Pete Resnick, 10/26/2011
Re: new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Tim Kehres, 10/26/2011
new draft: draft-santos-smtpgrey-01, Hector, 10/26/2011
Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Keith Moore, 10/26/2011
Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Dave CROCKER, 10/26/2011
RE: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/26/2011
retry=min/max syntax, Hector, 10/25/2011
retry=min-max [was Re: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting], Hector, 10/25/2011
Re: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting, Frank Ellermann, 10/25/2011
Re: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting, Hector, 10/25/2011
Re: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting, Frank Ellermann, 10/25/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/25/2011
Re: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting, Hector, 10/25/2011
Re: draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Pete Resnick, 10/25/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Paul Smith, 10/25/2011
Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., John C Klensin, 10/25/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/25/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/25/2011
Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Hector, 10/25/2011
Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Hector, 10/25/2011
Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Keith Moore, 10/25/2011
Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Dave CROCKER, 10/25/2011
Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Rolf E. Sonneveld, 10/25/2011
Re: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting, Frank Ellermann, 10/25/2011
Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., SM, 10/25/2011
Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Frank Ellermann, 10/25/2011
Re: retry=, Frank Ellermann, 10/25/2011
RE: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/25/2011
Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Dave CROCKER, 10/25/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Paul Smith, 10/25/2011
Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Paul Smith, 10/25/2011
RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/25/2011
RE: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/25/2011
RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/25/2011
Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Dave CROCKER, 10/25/2011
Re: Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Carl S. Gutekunst, 10/25/2011
Received header field for special processing, such as "held for moderation"., Dave CROCKER, 10/24/2011
Re: retry=, Hector, 10/24/2011
Re: retry=, Hector, 10/24/2011
Re: retry=delay, Hector, 10/24/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Claus Assmann, 10/24/2011
Re: retry= (was: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting), Claus Assmann, 10/24/2011
Re: retry=delay (was: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting), Claus Assmann, 10/24/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 10/24/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/24/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Keith Moore, 10/24/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector, 10/24/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Keith Moore, 10/24/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 10/24/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst, 10/24/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector, 10/24/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/24/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Richard Kulawiec, 10/24/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Richard Kulawiec, 10/24/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst, 10/24/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Carl S. Gutekunst, 10/24/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Keith Moore, 10/24/2011
RE: SMTP traffic control, ned+ietf-smtp, 10/24/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Paul Smith, 10/24/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector, 10/24/2011
RE: SMTP traffic control, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 10/24/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector, 10/24/2011
Re: I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting, Hector, 10/24/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Paul Smith, 10/24/2011
RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/24/2011
RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/24/2011
RE: SMTP traffic control, Rosenwald, Jordan, 10/24/2011
RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/24/2011
RE: SMTP traffic control, Rosenwald, Jordan, 10/24/2011
I-D SMTP Extension for Greylisting, Hector, 10/23/2011
RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/23/2011
draft-kucherawy-greylisting-bcp, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/23/2011
Re: Trusted agency, Russ Allbery, 10/20/2011
Re: Trusted agency, SM, 10/19/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Dave CROCKER, 10/19/2011
Re: Trusted agency, Douglas Otis, 10/19/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Douglas Otis, 10/19/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 10/19/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Derek J. Balling, 10/19/2011
RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Rosenwald, Jordan, 10/19/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 10/19/2011
RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Rosenwald, Jordan, 10/19/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 10/19/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Frank Ellermann, 10/19/2011
Re: Trusted agency, SM, 10/18/2011
Re: Trusted agency, Douglas Otis, 10/18/2011
RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/18/2011
Re: Trusted agency (was: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING), John Leslie, 10/18/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/18/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/18/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 10/18/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 10/18/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Tim Kehres, 10/18/2011
Trusted agency (was: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING), SM, 10/18/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Douglas Otis, 10/17/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 10/17/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Paul Smith, 10/17/2011
RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/17/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/17/2011
RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/17/2011
RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/17/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/17/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 10/17/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/17/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/17/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 10/17/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/17/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 10/17/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/17/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/17/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/17/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Dave CROCKER, 10/17/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Dave CROCKER, 10/17/2011
RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, John C Klensin, 10/17/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/17/2011
RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/16/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector Santos, 10/16/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Richard Kulawiec, 10/16/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/16/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Richard Kulawiec, 10/16/2011
Greylisting retry hints, Hector, 10/14/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Robert A. Rosenberg, 10/13/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Hector, 10/13/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Douglas Otis, 10/13/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Claus Assmann, 10/13/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, SM, 10/13/2011
RE: SMTP traffic control, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/13/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Keith Moore, 10/13/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Dave CROCKER, 10/13/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Paul Smith, 10/13/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control, Claus Assmann, 10/13/2011
Re: SMTP traffic control (was Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/13/2011
SMTP traffic control (was Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Steve Atkins, 10/13/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, John Levine, 10/13/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Paul Smith, 10/13/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 10/12/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, John Levine, 10/12/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, ned+ietf-smtp, 10/12/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 10/12/2011
Re: Mailing lists and GREY LISTING, Dave CROCKER, 10/12/2011
Mailing lists and GREY LISTING, =?utf-8?b?0JTQuNC70Y/QvSDQn9Cw0LvQsNGD0LfQvtCy?=, 10/12/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Dave CROCKER, 10/12/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Steve Atkins, 10/12/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Richard Kulawiec, 10/12/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Dave CROCKER, 10/12/2011
RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/12/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/12/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/12/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, John Levine, 10/12/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10/12/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Paul Smith, 10/12/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Dave CROCKER, 10/12/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 10/12/2011
RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Robert A. Rosenberg, 10/12/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/12/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, ned+ietf-smtp, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Tim Kehres, 10/11/2011
RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, John Levine, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, John Levine, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Douglas Otis, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Steve Atkins, 10/11/2011
RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Richard Kulawiec, 10/11/2011
RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 10/11/2011
RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Steve Atkins, 10/11/2011
RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/11/2011
RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Carl S. Gutekunst, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, John Levine, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Tim Kehres, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/11/2011
RE: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Rosenwald, Jordan, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Rosenwald, Jordan, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Rosenwald, Jordan, 10/11/2011
Re: We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Keith Moore, 10/11/2011
We need an IETF BCP for GREY LISTING, Hector, 10/11/2011
Re: How aggressively to reject Pipelining errors?, Carl S. Gutekunst, 10/10/2011
Re: How aggressively to reject Pipelining errors?, ned+ietf-smtp, 10/08/2011
Re: How aggressively to reject Pipelining errors?, Paul Smith, 10/08/2011
Re: How aggressively to reject Pipelining errors?, Julien ÉLIE, 10/08/2011
Re: How aggressively to reject Pipelining errors?, Tony Finch, 10/07/2011
Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Alessandro Vesely, 10/07/2011
How aggressively to reject Pipelining errors?, Carl S. Gutekunst, 10/06/2011
Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Dave CROCKER, 10/06/2011
Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Dave CROCKER, 10/06/2011
Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, John Levine, 10/06/2011
Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Douglas Otis, 10/06/2011
Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Derek J. Balling, 10/06/2011
Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Keith Moore, 10/06/2011
Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Derek J. Balling, 10/06/2011
Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Keith Moore, 10/06/2011
RE: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Rosenwald, Jordan, 10/06/2011
Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Keith Moore, 10/06/2011
RE: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Storz, Michael, 10/06/2011
Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Hector, 10/05/2011
Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Paul Smith, 10/05/2011
Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Douglas Otis, 10/05/2011
Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Carl S. Gutekunst, 10/05/2011
Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Keith Moore, 10/05/2011
Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Keith Moore, 10/05/2011
Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Alessandro Vesely, 10/05/2011
Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 10/05/2011
RE: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Storz, Michael, 10/05/2011
Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Keith Moore, 10/05/2011
RE: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Storz, Michael, 10/05/2011
RE: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Tony Finch, 10/05/2011
Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Keith Moore, 10/05/2011
RE: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Murray S. Kucherawy, 10/05/2011
RE: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Rosenwald, Jordan, 10/05/2011
Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10/04/2011
Re: 400 defer, Keith Moore, 09/28/2011
Re: 400 defer, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 09/28/2011
Re: 400 defer, Carl S. Gutekunst, 09/27/2011
Re: 400 defer, Hector, 09/27/2011
Re: 400 defer, Carl S. Gutekunst, 09/27/2011
Re: 400 defer, John C Klensin, 09/27/2011
Re: 400 defer, SM, 09/27/2011
400 defer, Hector, 09/27/2011
Re: The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 09/23/2011
The anti-abuse rDNS check that FTP gave up, Alessandro Vesely, 09/23/2011
Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos, 09/06/2011
Re: Recipient is offline, Menachem Moystoviz, 09/06/2011
Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch, 09/06/2011
Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos, 09/06/2011
Re: Recipient is offline, Dave CROCKER, 09/05/2011
Re: Recipient is offline, Hector, 09/05/2011
Re: Recipient is offline, Hector Santos, 09/05/2011
Re: Recipient is offline, Tony Finch, 09/05/2011
Re: Recipient is offline, John Levine, 09/05/2011

Page 1 of 15
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page] [Last Page]

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.