Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures

["Frank Ellermann" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Richard Kay wrote:

> My take FWIW, is that none should be retried because the data is 
> rejected (probably based on content analysis e.g. spam or
> virus). If the data response were a 450, a+b+c should be retried.

Thanks.  I was about to guess something else, but cowardly ended
up with "del" instead of "send".

Ned wrote:

| The message should be retried with recipient C only.

Also different from what I had in mind.   IOW it really deserves
a clarification.  I wonder if this could be coupled with the
"selective reject" ideas (draft-hall) posted here a year ago.

A "selective reject" feature could help to limit backscatter.

 Frank