[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures

To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures
From: Tony Finch <dot@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 19:26:37 +0100
Cc: ietf-smtp@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <g7i1cc$ocd$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-smtp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-smtp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-smtp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <402E64A5D66E100A1D64EACB@xxxxxxxxxx> <20080808051225.79707.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080808101904.GB25627@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <g7i1cc$ocd$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-smtp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Alpine 1.10 (LSU 962 2008-03-14)

On Fri, 8 Aug 2008, Frank Ellermann wrote:
>
> Also different from what I had in mind.   IOW it really deserves
> a clarification.  I wonder if this could be coupled with the
> "selective reject" ideas (draft-hall) posted here a year ago.

No, it's hard enough to clarify retries without introducing new
complexity.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@xxxxxxxx>  http://dotat.at/
SOUTH FITZROY: NORTHERLY 4 OR 5, BUT 6 IN EAST. MODERATE, OCCASIONALLY ROUGH
IN EAST. FAIR. GOOD.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures
  - From: Hector Santos

References:
- 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question)
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question)
  - From: John Levine
- Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question)
  - From: Richard Kay
- Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures
  - From: Frank Ellermann

Prev by Date: Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures
Next by Date: Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures (was: Re: retry question)
Previous by thread: Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures
Next by thread: Re: 2821bis/ter and procedures
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread